Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Too much vendor lock in. Will keep my VMs thanks.


sort by: page size:

Too much vendor lock-in.

I did mention vendor lock in?

Nice, do you have any concerns about vendor lock in?

Vendor lock in.

Would be bad for vendor lock-in.

Vendor lock-in isn't good for users either.

Yes it's significant, that's why I don't like vendor lock-in. It's very simple to use VMs on various cloud providers but as soon as you use their more integrated products, it can be a disaster.

Move away from vendor lock-in.

Vendor lock-in can be a real issue as you scale. I work at a company going through a hypergrowth phase, and we're more or less locked into Azure, which has been objectively awful for us

If your business model relies on vendor lockin then yes, please don't bother.

I don't see vendor lock-in as a net win for anyone but the vendor.

this doesn't solve vendor lock-in. You're just trading one vendor for another.

I see your architecture highly exposed to vendor lock-in. Also, your operations cost could become non-competive since you lack leverage to negotiate (b/c vendor lock-in). Finally, it seems hard to monitor and maintain.

Had the same thing happen except with AWS architects.

If you can stomach the vendor lock-in then it might not be so bad.


Vendor lock-in is what they're after in the cloud case. Every time we talk to our cloud provider reps they ask us which of their SaaS offerings we're using. Their heads spin when we tell them we're just using VMs and ask us why.

Vendor lock-in.

Vendor lock-in.

Vendor lock-in.

Vendor lock-in.
next

Legal | privacy