Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

You agreeing with the intent does not negate the effect.


sort by: page size:

Disagreeing with someone's opinion isn't interfering with it.

You're not contradicting what you're disagreeing with.

You're not thinking about the consequences of your position. What I said stands.

Just because you don't agree with it, or it offends you somehow, doesn't mean it's wrong.

Just because you do not agree with a position does not make it manipulative.

Statements are not violent, even if they have harmful effects.

One statement does not necessarily contradicts another.

Just because you do not agree does not make it hatred.

Intent may not necessarily matter.

It isn’t rude to express an opinion that doesn’t confirm your desired result.

In other words, you have no salient objections to what I've said. Got it.

Disagreement doesn't imply misunderstanding.

What you wrote doesn't contradict what he wrote.

Saying things doesn't inflict a harm of the same nature as the experiments. The line-drawing is not so impossible or purely subjective that it cannot or should not be undertaken.

Both assertions are not incompatible.

Just because you don't like it it does not mean this is not true.

These two statements are not incompatible.

Your truism doesn’t refute their point.

Disagreement is not disrespect.
next

Legal | privacy