Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

This is fascinating but also tendentious. Is the information reliable? If not, is there a more accurate source?


sort by: page size:

How reliable of a source is this? I'm not familiar with it.

Is this a credible source?

Is this a reliable source?

Is this a reliable source?

This is an unusually poorly written Wikipedia article with a very weird style and a lot of unsourced statements. I would be very hesitant to trust it without extensively reading the sources.

Is there a credible source for this?

Can anyone comment on the credibility of this article?

Is your source on this reliable?

Can someone speak to the reliability of this site? Or provide a corroborating source?

That is interesting but it looks pretty biased. Any other sources?

Is there a more credible source available than this?

I’m having a hard time evaluating the credibility of this article. They mention “multiple sources,” but I can’t find any references. Can anyone find anything that vouches for the credibility of this report?

Is there a reputable, reliable source for this?

Never seen or heard of this source before... Is it credible? Had this story been reported anywhere else?

Don't mean to claim it's not, I just feel wary of believing stories that sound incredible lately....


This contradicts everything I’ve ever read on the topic, is there a good reason I should trust this source over others?

Could you please elaborate on this (links)? I am looking for discussion about how this would be inaccurate or biased? Thanks

Is there a more reliable source?

True. Like I said: "from this description". No idea how accurate it is. It would be good to have other sources.

Does anybody have any more reliable sources?
next

Legal | privacy