Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

We are talking about the company that got a license to use json for evil


sort by: page size:

Yup, they actually acquired anti-reverse engineering startup Strong.codes after using their software for years

This is pretty interesting/terrifying. Could you say more about the startup? At least its name?

It's a big company, everyone on hackernews knows it.

You should envy the team. They've raised tens of millions of dollars for licensing of an algorithm that people RE'd in a day.

Their business now involves lots of bizdev droids and threatening open source implementors with baseless copyright lawsuits. It's nice work if you can get it.


They're selling the service, which is a derivative work of the code.

They didn't say. Business is licensing an algorithm we designed to enterprise customers for use in their software products.

Dong is my surname by the way.


It is owned by a single corporate entity who is also its primary sponsor, Typesafe. This is similar to how Joyent owns node, and how they sponsor it's development, along with NodeJitsu, Microsoft, Heroku and others.

Hard to say without knowing more details but there are two big red flags in the first option: that the co is run by a VC as a side project and that it is "productizing" technology licensed from someone else.

which company is behind this application?

This is actually implying that one of the listed entities is a department within company that produced this marvelous software. I wonder which.

Said by the company that uses .io

A few years back Axios was attempting to purchase a startup I was employed with.

Very interesting company. They have data on 5 billion people that sits in an airport hanger sized building.


If their Github is anything to go by, they appear to work for a Chinese company.

Did not find any obvious references as to who is backing this project, but it seems to be a Chinese software consultancy. https://www.highgo.ca/

> What’s the point of doing some just for the sake of destroying other people’s business?

Apart from any potential ideological reasons related to open source, they are likely planning to support their own business by providing a compelling product.


It’s NSF listed for commercial use.

A startup called Njori is trying, and mostly failing, to compete.


They're a British tech company, simply owned by a Chinese private equity fund.

And they're sort of known for historically being very anti open source and their SDK difficult to continuously integrate into a larger product.


Huh, it's the physical world version of building a single product company on top of an unsupported API.

What I meant was the goal of the company was to build technology and license that via an API, not become a destination site.

It's a large boring company. Bring on the Salesforce Show HN's lol. The link you reference makes it sound like it should come from a single person who is hacking something together and wants to share it.
next

Legal | privacy