Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Yes, self-hosting falls under "owning your own backend". The managed option carries the same risk of shutdown as with any other provider. I think you can stop spamming your website in this thread now that you've mentioned it a half dozen times though.


sort by: page size:

Is self hosting an option?

Is it self-hosting?

Self hosting

Thats not self hosting, is it?

Can I self hosted this ?

Self-hosted?

That is _your_ definition of self-hosting. Do you rely on an entity for your internet connection? At some point, you _will_ need to rely on someone else's infrastructure.

Isn't self-hosting forbidden by the terms of use in most consumer level internet packages these days?

Yes. Self hosting for me can come because of a few different reasons: - I want to ensure my data is safe - I want to ensure uptime or performance - I want to ensure continuity if the SaaS company disappears

Pricing matters of course. I get really ticked off at the overprice of many SaaS.


It sounds like you confirmed that it can't be self-hosted - are you sure about it not being true?

oh i'm not sure if it does self-hosting. i just use their cloud version.

See, I wouldn’t call it self-hosted if you can’t actually… self-host it. Someone else’s server isn’t mine.

Self hosting how?

Wait, isn't that just called Self-hosted?

Can it be self-hosted at least?

Is it really self-hosting if you're running it on someone's cloud?

self-hosting for yourself can be a sane decision

self-hosting for a business is RARELY sane :)


What's wrong with self hosting?

Self hosted as a feature. Akin to managed vs colo hosting.
next

Legal | privacy