Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

It's a good thing they had great documentation... oh wait.


sort by: page size:

Well, in their defense, most documentation is terrible. You get used to being able to find something in two Google searches that you couldn't find in five minutes looking through the docs.

Now we're never going to get better documentation /$.

Turns out good documentation doesn't help anyone if they can't buy the thing eh?

Regardless of the proximate cause, it's very frustrating when companies don't prioritize good documentation.

...with a history of awful/non-existent documentation.

I agree. Most orgs will say they want more/better documentation, but their actions (or lack thereof) shows the opposite.

I'll gladly take long but coherent documentation over poor or non-existent documentation. This is a strange thing to complain about in my opinion.

There's no reason they can't have amazing documentation, but I imagine they don't because people are going to use the platform anyway. People are basically forced to use it because that's where so many of their customers are, so they can just treat their users like crap and get away with it. Why spend time on documentation when it will probably only cost them money to do so?

Such a sad state of affairs.


I think the documentation is usually pretty great if you can find it. Somehow I never seem to be able to.

I stopped taking this seriously after "the documentation is really good".

Not sure whether this is your real opinion or you are just making fun of people who say that.


Documentation is bad when it is missing.

Hmm, “lacking documentation” and “great developer experience” seem mutually exclusive to me.

LOL I think that'll be my go to excuse for lack of documentation for now on....

I wonder if they'll start maintaining decent developer documentation again someday.

It’s funny how you just can’t win with documentation: either “there is no documentation” or “tl;dr”

Bad documentation covers obvious things very well, and doesn't cover tricky parts at all. This is especially what you get if the writer of the documentation is paid by the amount of written text: there is no incentive to spend time investigating the hard parts, but a lot of incentive to explain the easy parts in too much detail.

Interesting article. I guess it just shows how to circumvent poor documentation.

On the one hand, I agree with you. On the other; GOD I hope it works because their documentation is loathsome sometimes.

It is important tho to note that wrong documentation is significantly worse than no documentation.
next

Legal | privacy