Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I don't find it that great. Finding your own repositories is a bit cryptic compared to bitbucket.


sort by: page size:

I've used BitBucket as a solo dev working on personal projects, a solo consultant, and an employee on a team. It's pretty mediocre, especially if you look beyond its integration with the rest of the Atlassian ecosystem.

The number of times I've wanted to search a repo for something only to have to clone it and search in my IDE is staggering.


I don't like it and it reminds me of Bitbucket :(

Meh. I like BitBucket's unlimited private repo model much better.

Compared to bitbucket, definitely not. I've become increasingly frustrated by the lack of pace of development and feature improvements on bitbucket.

I still find Bitbucket less usable than Github. The price is right, I suppose.

Bitbucket is pretty good

I'm genuinely curious, what do you like better about bitbucket?

BitBucket is okay, but not superior in any way.

It's cheaper and has private repos for free and that's it.

The UI is clunky and the community is much smaller than Githubs.

I also don't understand why they try to sell it with the Jira integration as if it was a good thing. The only people I heard saying good things about Jira and this marketplace where working on companies that sold stuff there.


I started using bitbucket for the private repositories and I have to say, never had a problem... maybe I am not a hardcore user that tries to use the most obscure functionality, far from it. But I find myself fine with it.

Fair point. I've only been to a few BitBucket repos in the past year or two and I never really enjoyed the experience.

I like Bitbucket's private repos and more reasonable entry-level plan, but I think its UX is well behind GitHub.

I'd argue bitbucket has more features. At least in terms of granular repo permissions, they are way ahead.

The Bitbucket I've used have all been self-hosted and it's pretty good. There might be some cases where it doesn't have the features you want, but for 99% of all usage it's absolutely fine. The Jira integration is really neat and something I've missed in other setups.

Your right it is kind of boring, and that's really all I want. GitHub is okay as well, but it's also pretty weird how it tries to be a social network to the point where I can't have the first page I see be my own repos.


Yes, seems a bit like Bitbucket/Jira stuff, and I don't know many people who liked it.

What's better about Bitbucket? I've never used it, just wondering.

I agree completely. Bitbucket is OK, but everything else is so painful, and the Bitbucket alternatives are better than it anyways.

Agreed about Bitbucket. I've used it for a long time and haven't found it to be substantively different from GitHub in either functionality or reliability. The major downside, as I see it, is that it's just not as popular.

I like Bitbucket and have been using them for some time but their interface is slow and not as intuitive as Github's.

Very nice. It looks like something I could use except that most of the repos I work on are public.

But I think evanbarter's question is valid: why this over BitBucket? Any compelling reasons...

next

Legal | privacy