Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Centralization happens naturally. There's a reason why we see it again and again. https://medium.com/@Exolymph/i-swear-i-m-not-a-statist-df990...


sort by: page size:

why is this the case? why hasn't it been the case until now? what has changed that would reverse the constant trend toward centralization?

Ah yes, centralization.

Gotta love centralization

It's because centralization is really, really convenient when it works correctly. And most of the time, it does. It's just when it breaks it's really, really bad.

Centralization is great, isn't it?

Centralization.

Isn't this the obvious result, if not an actual goal, of centralization?

Yay centralization!

Centralization

That's centralization, just replicated for redundancy.

People centralize because centralization solves real problems they have.

If we want decentralization, we have to build alternatives as convenient and simple as the centralized ones, and that's a hard project.


Centralization is THE problem.

Which isn't ever going to happen as the benefits of centralization are too great, as it has been empirically observed time and time again.

What? How is centralization the culprit?

Of course centralization is easier. The problem is that it's centralized.

TLDR: Centralization (winner takes all) is the result of preferential attachment. Some kind of downward pressure is required to counterbalance, counteract.

This is the problem with centralization.

And don't forget centralization.

What the hell are you talking about? There is massive centralization.
next

Legal | privacy