Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Not in the case of negative interest rates.


sort by: page size:

Interest rates can be negative.

That cannot explain a negative interest rate.

Negative interest rates.

Negative interest rates?

Not if the interest rate is low.

Currently, that interest rate is negative.

Wouldn’t that undermine the point of negative rates?

Better to just charge interest on cash stored at banks.


Not if you have negative interest rates. I heard on the radio that some European banks want to introduce this.

When interest rates are negative, there is no other option than to fund current obligations from equity. You can't do it from interest, because there isn't any.

Not if the interest is lower than inflation.

If you also mean negative interest, than yes. Otherwise, the rate of interest is meaningless if the debt cannot be collected.

It does not, in an ideal economic scenario, discourage borrowing - it just means nominal interest rates might be negative.

Any reasoning you want to give on this? Negative nominal interest rates already exist in European countries as a counterexample.

The argument against negative interest rates was that people could simply store cash in a vault and get a 0% return, rather than lend it for a negative return. In practice very slightly negative rates seem to work out because storing large amounts of cash in a vault is hard. However, it's probably still right to assume that if interest rates are meaningfully negative for a while everyone will switch to storing cash.

Help me explain where my unfounded assumption is. If the interest rate is negative, that explicitly means that money in the future is worth more than money today. That's the definition of a negative interest rate.

What does it even mean to have a negative interest rate?

The article doesn't spell it out, although it should be obvious, "negative interest rates" means "charging you to hold your own money".

Much depends on the exact phrasing. Offering negative interest rates on consumer accounts is ludicrous to the point of rendering it impossible. For a national bank, nah, not so much.

I still don't fully understand negative interest rates. So banks then have a negative penalty for holding cash?
next

Legal | privacy