Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

You can fly from California to Russia and back in less than 10.5 hours today, it's not that far from Alaska.


sort by: page size:

I know Mach 3 is fast, but it still is amazing flying California to Russia and back in 10.5 hours.

A lot of routes to Asia, which are still pretty far (10-12 hours to Tokyo). Nothing to Russia far east, which would be a bit closer.

I’ve been in plenty of international trips where I transferred in SF or even Chicago or New York. It is a bit weird flying down to SF just to go back up to asia.


Good point! If you flew from SF to AU, you’d lose a “day” in much less than 24 hours.

Back in the day, you could get from Berlin to Moscow and back in less than five years. Today, that's not enough time to get from LA to San Francisco.

If they could make it quiet enough to go over land, transcontinental US flights would be great; LA/NY in 2.5 hours would likely have a pretty high demand.

[edit] As someone who flies LA/DC fairly regularly I do have to mention my favorite record of the SR-71 doing that flight in under 65 minutes.


Being along the coast also makes offshore supersonic flight possible. With a good aircraft, San Diego to Seattle should be about an hour.

Depending on the time of year the flights from SFO to HKG will fly north along the coast to Alaska, then over to Siberia and down the Asia coast. This is a 15hr+ flight to avoid the Jet Stream. The flight back is 4+ hours shorter!

You can tell it's going to be an excellent article when a flight to Sochi takes 75 hours.

Sure, but it’s quite a flight from San Francisco

Would he have to fly through Europe? Isn't a direct flight from the eastern end of Russia over the Pacific possible as well?

Over Russia.

From Norway to Svalbard to some island between Russia and Alaska. From there to Japan.

It looks very goofy on a map but it's a lot shorter of a distance than expected.


Probably gradual optimizations in flying from Alaska, thru the Aleutian islands, to Kamchatka Russia, to Japan, to Korea, to China, to Taiwan, to the Philippines, to Indonesia, to Australia.

In fact, going directly over the Pacific is only maybe ~30% shorter.


On land, it’d more like 1200 miles, so closer to 5 hours. Almost double the flight time.

The article says "800 mph". Meaning it would be around 30 minutes. Not including accel/decel. No? It takes a flight hour to hour and a half from LA <> SF.

Interesting according to the map, the standard for first class mail from New York will reach the most northern part of Alaska in 4 days versus 5 days for Los Angeles.

> mostly within less than insane flight times (explains the lack of New Zealand on the list)

New Zealand isn't that far away. LAX to AKL is about 11 hours travel time. The west coast to many Asian cities is at least 14 hours, if not 20 by the time you add in layovers.


A 24 hour flight to cross the Pacific? 14 hours sounds more realistic...

Sure, but it's still very short.

How are they even going to deliver this plane? That's not enough range for a ferry pilot to deliver it to Europe or Asia, even hopping at every available airport around the Arctic.


You'd need a lot more range. The Concorde had a range of about 4500 miles. Even SFO-NRT (Tokyo) is over 5000 miles. And if you have to make a fuel stop--probably in Anchorage--you're really starting to cut into the time advantage.
next

Legal | privacy