Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Or why not cut your margins right down, helping your customers and hurting your competitors, like Amazon?


sort by: page size:

Cutting cost can often bring in revenue.

If you can provide the same product or service but with a smaller margin, you can out price your competitors and win the customers over.

I think Jeff Bezos is famous for saying: Your margin is my opportunity.


Unless you are a monopoly, one of your competitors will drop their prices since they too will be looking for improvements. As Bezos says "your margin is my opportunity".

You make it sound like its an option. Its not.

If your margins are razor thin. You have to be ruthless. That permeates to your culture.

Do you things are any better at Amazon, Foxconn or other warehouse places?


If you reduce usefulness of your product (your store) to the point where people can't get what they want and don't use it, it doesn't matter how much margin you have.

In theory, yes, but if you have a profitable business with a 1% margin by definition it already has to be absolutely giant (e.g. Amazon) to be making money. And to reduce costs at this scale is harder than increasing sales.

More margins make for more profit. It's always good to reduce costs regardless of how much you charge.

Running low margins in retail is often more of a really cutthroat business strategy, rather than simply trying to be nice to customers. You can easily run smaller competitors out of business, and increase your volume and overall profits, by making the competition unable to compete.

There are industries where 1.4% margins are acceptable(for example, supermarkets) and they might even be acceptable for computer parts, problem is that Amazon has ~5% margins.

If you realize you can cut your storage/compute/etc costs by an order of magnitude, will you pass that savings on to your customers?

Or will you increase your margins?


It's not really about the cut they take, but more about the fact that they take over the sales channel, and from there take a bigger cut and eventually drive your margins to zero.

You can reduce your margin, but you can't really reduce the wholesale price. If the big labels expect to take $0.70 from you and your target audience is not willing to pay a dollar but rather something like $0.50, then you can only make negative profit.

Not always true is all I'm saying. From a business perspective, it makes sense to target higher margin customers .

You could argue the opposite. what's the point of great margins if you have no scale?

look at the Amazon example. they were unprofitable for a very very long time. and the retail business is still very miniscule margins


Remember that Amazon loves low-margin businesses. You might not see much fat to trim, but I'm sure Amazon can save a few cents here and there.

Can you really blame them? We in the tech industry are used to fat margins. Retail margins are thinner than the new iPad. If you were running a business like that, wouldn't you love to get an extra 2 - 5% of your revenue back, and exert considerable effort to do so?

Perhaps that rule could be rewritten as 6. Never drop your margins.

Sure, find ways to save costs and pass this on to your customers, but only when it improves your margins a bit.


Why? Margins matter, not just dollars alone.

If you spend 75 cents to earn a dollar on one customer and can spend 25 cents to earn a dollar on another customer, you'd be dumb not to take customer 2.


That's exactly what I was suggesting: If you are stuck in a low margin business and see that a provider such as google is screwing up your margins, you should really try to work on another idea which has higher margins.

Working on a low margin business is a choice! You can always ditch it and try to find something with higher margins (= higher value created for users).


If the margins are high enough, then it's optimal to overproduce and then sell to everyone who will buy at a certain price point. If discounts will reduce your ability to sell the same brand in the future at that price point, it can be financially optimal to destroy it instead.

THIS IS INTENTIONAL.

next

Legal | privacy