Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Bandwidth costs do exceed $100, but that's not a factor.


sort by: page size:

Bandwidth is unlimited. You can have 100 tb in traffic and it will cost zero.

Bandwidth costs are not really the major cost of providing content.

That's a really small cost, however. Bandwidth is stupid cheap.

Actual cost of bandwidth is approaching zero, fwiw.

The bandwidth and infrastructure is not where the costs are.

No charge for bandwidth?

Bandwidth is cheap.

He's not concerned about his bandwidth costs, but about the bandwidth costs (in both money and time) to the users.

And for the most part, it doesn't matter how much money you have to spend on it. If I were inclined to offer twice as much for double the bandwidth, that's just not an option. (Not that I feel like I'm getting the bandwidth I pay for in the first place...)

And the bandwidth is $.01/GB and you don't pay for transactions.

And the bandwidth is $.01/GB and you don't pay for transactions.

Zero bandwidth cost within the same zone.

It's not incompetent or even more expensive if you assume network bandwidth is a fixed cost.

What about bandwidth costs?

But why does it matter? Bandwidth is super-cheap.

The bandwidth is less than 5% of the total cost. It's about $2500 a month.

Well, 100x the bandwidth for 10x the price.

Bandwidth costs way less than $0.003/GB. Even cheaper for Netflix because ISPs are willing to host cache servers for free.

FWIW, $100/mo is for small businesses, so presumably many users sharing the bandwidth. It is $70/mo for residential.
next

Legal | privacy