Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Yes, but the marginal gains add up to equal the big breakthroughs!

Eventually we increase the ease of texting to the point where we're reading minds and the user never has to touch their phone.

I may be serious, I can't tell.



sort by: page size:

How would that be an improvement over text messaging?

I'm astounded at how frequently people are apparently making breakthroughs in sending raw text between people.

I keep thinking that's a mousetrap, and people somehow keep making money off of* better ones.

Shows how much I know.

* Or at least building huge userbases on...


what about emoji, gifs, pics, hyperlinks. texting is way more efficient than talking.

Maybe, to the extent that people care enough about it to bug their android-owning contacts about it. I don't think that will be a very large number of users, especially since this is pretty trivial compared to the features you lose in iMessage group chats by adding SMS contacts.

Nah, the only way to get people to stop texting will be to remove it. It's just too damn useful to not use.

Being text-only helps immensely.

MUCH better. You know what would be cool? If you implement an SMS service like Sendhub so people can text themselves the link. Just an idea..

Be honest, it's for texting, right? b^)

I remember reading about a startup in Israel doing exactly what you are describing. Their product is positioned as an alternative language for faster/easier texting on cell phones.

(if I remember correctly)


We agree a large part of the advantage is not touching the phone at all. I disagree about voice commands though- if you put that app in the hands of someone who's never used it before, most people will give up before they successfully send a text.

Will this include texting?

It's not the same as reading, though. I've done that in the past and it worked out like this:

"Oh, I know exactly who is texting me. They are a high priority person in my life. Let's make sure they're okay...

Aaand it's a cat gif."

The text display is the game-changer here.


It won't take 2 more minutes to chat via text.

I thanked your top level comment, but this whole thread is great. I fond my self worth data that sounds like yours. I'm excited to try fast text.

Text messages exist

ummm google did do this first ... it was called buzz and if you recall, it failed, quite miserably I might add.

That said, yes this may change SOME people's way of life for messaging, but it is not the game changer I was expecting it to be, and to be honest is much less remarkable than I am sure MOST were thinking


Interesting points. I'm not sure if SMS is rich enough to support a full fledged social tech, but I kind the idea of keeping the technology open. I will definitely keep thinking about this!

I would guess the most likely next step is integration similar to what is seen in Android with contacts existing on the phone.

I could also mean an almost de facto replacement of text messages.


The texting conversation would already be waiting in iMessage. The article is just a ?-Tab away. To me, it seems even easier than the original desire to swipe. Don't do anything, it's already waiting for you. :-)
next

Legal | privacy