Hacker Read

2. I'm wondering (as others have outlined) that, granted they do give me value today at the risk of my privacy, but what about the future, what if there motives change, that can affect me in insidious ways.

Hexstream | karma 3090 | avg karma 1.91 · | 2009-04-29 21:30:36+00:00

May I inquire about your thought process with respect to security implications when you wrote this code?

A. "I know this is sloppy and will be found out sooner or later, but I hope people will respect the restriction anyway."

B. "I know this is sloppy, but I hope nobody will find out."

C. "This isn't really sloppy, as I know full well the security implications and don't care about them at all."

D. Didn't really think about the implications.

reply

plutonorm | karma 967 | avg karma 1.48 · | 2021-04-09 13:27:29+00:00

1: why? 2: why? 3: why?

Your answer feels dismissive and yet at the same time naive.

reply

ethanbond | karma 13235 | avg karma 3.16 · | 2023-02-14 18:23:38

1) No they wouldn't

2) If they would, then this would be a very good reason not to investigate further

reply

_jal | karma 13880 | avg karma 4.13 · | 2020-08-05 20:00:15+00:00

1) Yes.

2) Well, I can't, but the capability exists.

3) Dig.

reply

FartyMcFarter | karma 5189 | avg karma 3.75 · | 2019-03-14 14:55:00

1. No.

2. I don't know (see 1). What a loaded question though.

reply

take_me_out_pls | karma 19 | avg karma 2.11 · | 2021-07-14 01:58:48

1. I will do so today. 2. It felt like the only positive thing I could get of this, but maybe it's selfish? 3. Right, I should check that for sure, thanks. 4. Did that immediately when it happened, thanks

koiz | karma 138 | avg karma 1.25 · | 2018-10-15 21:12:22+00:00

1. No it wont, please show me where this is happening. 2. No it wont, please show me where this is happening. 3. No it wont, please show me where this is happening.

There's concerns and then crazy questions and comments.

reply