As far as I could tell, this wasn't about getting stimulated by the release/ingestion of chemicals but rather involved zoopharmacognosy, given the "smoke" was produced by expelling a cloud of ash.
I.e. it wasn't trying to get high for the sake of getting high but rather trying to counteract the effects of pathogens.
Do they though? I've wondered this before as a non-smoker.
I assume patches are slow release but smoking provides a bigger hit all at once. Sometimes that's important, both in terms of impact and building tolerance.
Does smoking (or smelling like smoke) keep mosquitoes away? I'm wondering if some second-order effect, like malaria prevention, led doctors back then to think that smoking was healthy.
But I was bitten countless times when I was a smoker, so it's not a very effective remedy.
reply