Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Thankfully, this threading depth only goes so far which perfectly coincides with my interest in responding.


sort by: page size:

The thread is deeper than two posts.

I hit the threads button from time to time. I don't get involved in long discussions---life is too short.

I adore threads like this. They really bring to focus exactly how much more I have to learn.

Ask one level higher in the thread.

> are they part of the same thread, or a new thread, and how do you define the boundary?

This is very interesting and something we're still exploring.


I'm going to respond only in the other thread because I'm tired of following 2 threads.

I should have known better than to respond to someone who literally Godwinned the thread right off the bat.

Isn't this thread exactly the right spot to reply?

I have quite deeply enjoyed this thread myself. Thanks :)

sure! I was just reacting to the general threading angst in the comments.

this thread is relevant to my interests.

This exact point is addressed: see thread.

I’m absolutely loving that this comment is three threads deep.

Yeah, I basically got you with reply to my other comment. Multiple threads FTL.

And that justifies the remainder of the thread existing how, exactly?

If you want to talk about that, you should contact me privately. I don't want to derail a nice thread.

Every thread.... Absolutely. I'll have to set aside some extra time, but if that's what you want, every thread. Coming right up.

I am very interested to see where this thread goes...

When the string of Re:Re:Re:Fwd:Re:Re: reach the line width of your email client you start a new thread.
next

Legal | privacy