Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Yes, I believe so. It was pegging multiple cores.


sort by: page size:

Was this a fully parallel build (using all cores)?

No, 1 performance + 4 efficiency cores. It feels like just adding up the count is a bit of a cheat though.

That's correct, I meant the many cores to allude to many processes.

2 cores?

Yes it is. They have four 16 thread pipelines, and two single thread pipelines per core. 4*16=64 and 64+2=66

Was that a full parallel build (using all available cores)?

Because that's what counts for me, as a developer.


I would assume so - it's a 3.7gz quad core and a 3.5ghz hex core

Even more cores?

I thought I remembered that in the presentation they had souped up the individual cores too. Must be I'm misremembering.

Yes but they said 13x speedup not 13x more processors/cores. Probably just a non-technical writeup tbh.

No, the went multicore because 5 GHz is the physical limit for modern semiconductor processes. And IPC is also hitting its limits.

You're right this is a dual core, with two way hyperthreading, so 4 logical cores.

What I quoted does clarify (although in a convoluted way) that it is multi-core.

Wow, that's interesting! Do you know if somebody tried to enable one of this "extra cores"?

No, A12 can use all the cores at the same time, it is different from a traditional big.little. At least this is what they said during the event.

Yeah, the point is about 16 core one.

Looks like you're right, likely C cores based on what I've seen as well.

Where did you read that? The article would seem to imply it was an eight-core chip they were working with.

This probably sold a lot of extra CPUs.
next

Legal | privacy