Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

That's a very non-inclusive way of thinking, and it is hard to imagine that it benefits the community as a whole. What if you substituted developers, in this situation, for doctors?


sort by: page size:

You and the developers you know don't encompass all of humanity.

I agree with this and think it touches on a more fundamental issue with our industry; in general, developers are not viewed as professionals by their employers or eve themselves. I think many of the negative aspects of the profession can be mitigated if developers would just take a different perspective on their work like viewing themselves more as plumbers, electricians, doctors or lawyers and less as clerks.

Am I the only one to whom "developer advocate" sounds like a career path that's a bit like "dermatologist"? ...in the sense that it's people who went to medical school but didn't quite cut it as REAL doctors?

I mostly agree with you, but: developers are people too.

Treating devs as people would be a good start.

Sure. But the developer population is far smaller than the general population.

Unfortunately not everyone is a developer.

Isn't picking from a local pool of developers that share a monoculture potentially a handicap to communication?

This is not unique to developers. I can say for my country (India) that every doctor "dreams" to start his own hospital. Every CA or lawyer wants to establish his/her own firm.

If the developers don't play a crucial role, then why did I just read an article claiming we need more of them?

I see many comments here about developers upset about being treated as "just a developer."

Well, if you want to be respected as more than "just a developer," you'll need to understand more about the real world. Specifically people.

If that doesn't convince you, look at it this way: healthcare is a huge, growing, and technologically behind-the-curve industry. It offers a huge market for your services. Mental healthcare needs better solutions.

Also, I have met my share of severally mentally disturbed developers. So this could be any of us we're talking about.


Yes, what about developers, scientists, etc.

No, developers should.

That's one of our strategies.

While we are actively pursuing opportunities with developers, but we also want community to flourish even without the developers present.


I don't know I you're being intellectually dishonest or are bad at reading comprehension, but the author said "many developers," not "all developers."

> Developers

You could make the same argument for most major cities in the world that have a strong developer community.

Good point. The issue is easily solved by making developera part of the program by choosing whcig projcts they would like to work on the most and why

Most devs probably want that but what they really want is developping for a minority that represents a majority
next

Legal | privacy