This is like saying "The iPhone is not better than Android". There is room for multiple offerings with different strengths and paths to market appealing to different types of users.
It's quite literally as fast and exactly as many inputs as Android. They've copied each others strengths for so many years, that frankly I can't understand opinions like yours, as much as I'd like to
I didn't say it is better. I said it doesn't matter if it's leaps and bounds better. Everyone hates them worse than The Devil and there's nothing that can be done about it regardless of ecosystem and devices. People just aren't willing to even peek, nevermind even giving it a shot.
it's not iphone. you can't compare an incumbent frontrun technology with a community playing catch up. if you can't see why android is better and will be more successful than iphone then it's not for you.
Not sure why comparing with Android is necessary. To me, the more interesting comparison is to older Apple products. Compared to older products, it seems that Apple has seriously regressed in terms of stability and usability.
No not really. If you put them in a list of features and compare them it seems pretty close, they have most of the same stuff. But if you actually learn and use both the android one is much worse.
I'm not sure we are comparing Apples to Apples here... Pun intended?
Android is an OS and iPhone is the hardware.
Is the Pixel 4 XL better than the iPhone 12 Pro Max? Quite possible.
Is Android better than iOS? Quite possible.
I get the fact that iOS and the iPhone are tightly coupled, but Android is the exact opposite where software and hardware are not coupled Android implementations from manufacturer to manufacturer differs quite significantly.
It's definitely a weird headline for an article that compares more a Google implementation to an Apple Implementation.
This is an incredibly dumb assertion and you should be ashamed of yourself for making it.
People make the comparison between the two because both companies have generally marched to their own tune. While their competitors obsessed over expanding the feature checklist of their devices, they worked on producing quality content on quality hardware. They were never the most advanced, but they were the simplest and most exciting.
No, what is being discussed is using a developer build of a very alpha-state software as a comparison point against something released that has tens of millions of devices in the market.
I didn't mean to say I had a strong opinion about who was more innovative or whatever. It's just a clever use of language to flip the usual narrative (Android is a cheaper, "open" version of iOS) against them.
reply