Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Even prior to its acquisition. I seriously disliked finding projects on Bitbucket, the UX just seems to be wrong for how I want to interact with codebases and documentation. It's only gotten worse since they were bought.


sort by: page size:

Imo it's because bitbucket UI is just bad. Especially issues and navigation among repositories. I have a really hard time to get used to it.

unfortuntely, bitbucket sucks. the website is slow as hell, the design is terrible, the code review features and issue tracking are awful

I don't like it and it reminds me of Bitbucket :(

My company was using GitHub and then we were purchased by a company using BitBucket and had to switch over. We don't even use the CI/CD features but IMO the BitBucket experience is just horrible overall.

Bitbucket's UX and integrations are worse than Github.

BitBucket has a terrible UI, historically suffers from outages, and is owned by Atlassian which is yet another downside.

Bitbucket was reasonably good 8 years ago, but they have progressively fallen further and further behind.

I've seen lots of companies move away from their stack over the last few years.

The UI is a dog slow , bloated mess of Javascript and is unusable on big PRs, and that's just the most obvious flaw.

I personally would not recommend it.


Bitbucket had a much crappier UI.

Also, the UX on bitbucket is very convoluted, to me at least.

It sounds like recently they sorted things out, but Bitbucket's interface was buggy to the point of unusability for me. Some scary permission issues like not being removed from a corporate team.

I moved to bitbucket as well but for the team features not for the ecosystem: I hate jira and confluence with passion.

I agree completely. Bitbucket is OK, but everything else is so painful, and the Bitbucket alternatives are better than it anyways.

Bitbucket is not bad. It has features I miss in GitHub, particularly the larger selection of PR merge strategies so I can satisfy my git history OCD.

Probably the Atlassian product I hate the least.


Firstly Bitbucket allowed free personal private repos, so many people who did not actually want to use it did for closed source projects. Bitbucket has generally had the least pleasing UI, and the association with Atlassian sort of corporate feel made it seem uncool to a degree. It just didn't really feel great to use for me. I've used all 3 extensively.

I've transitioned with companies from Github to Gitlab, from Bitbucket to GitHub etc. but never to Bitbucket. In fairness I was using Gitlab during their great outage, so I can say that cool is not always reliable. And coolness fades and dies relatively fast.

But I can't remember Bitbucket ever being cool.


To be fair, BitBucket was way uglier than GitHub until very recently (latest redesign). That's a turn-off for most people (unfortunately).

The new BitBucket is awesome, though.


I use Bitbucket at work. And it stinks compared to Github.

I have been quite happy with BitBucket. This is mostly from a UX perspective. The design is clean and simple. I’m using GitLab lately too, and my experience is the opposite. I can’t think of any webapp with a worse UX.

But Bitbucket is fricken awful though. I think I have an allergy to everything designed by Atlassian

yeah. I'm dropping Bitbucket in favor of this for my private projects. BitBucket's UI is so un-intuitive that I (most of the time) dread actually having to log into the web UIs for it.

I'm also just much more comfortable with GitHub since I use it daily in my day job.

next

Legal | privacy