Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Hah, yea, same here. He almost explains it in the book, but not quite.


sort by: page size:

Fair enough! I'm not familiar with the book.

Ah I hadnt realized, thought OP meant it was in the book. I agree with your assessment then

The author mentions this as well. I don’t know how I’ve never connected those dots.

Yeah I do see what you mean, I should have either gone the whole hog or not at all, I actually read that book a couple of years ago as it turns out!

I also thought it was about the book and almost skipped this until reading your comment.

I had read the book, but not the Wikipedia article.

Sorry, which book? Feeling like I missed an in-joke here...

Have you read the book? What part was not clear to you?

Which part is that? I don't recall this bit being in the book.

I read that book like 10 times and I never got that. Thanks for the hint!

Haha, there's no intuition behind these. You should still read the book, but because of other reasons.

Aha, that may explain my confusion. It's been years since I've read it, I'll have to dig it out and see which version I have.

I think the best explanation is that you missed rest of the chapters! :)

No he said it while talking about the book, but I don't think it's in the book.

Oh, really nice takeaway! That does make a lot of sense, I'll have to re-read it.

I just remember getting very close to the end and thinking I had some copy with tons of missing pages or something because there was no way to have some conclusion with the remaining pages haha.

With this in mind, it will probably make much more sense.


Care to explain? I didn't really get anything like that from the book.

Haha, yeah, I am reading the book these days, and I clearly remember thinking that those effects seemed really exaggerated.

In a later book, they also reveal the question...kinda.

Ah got it -- I thought maybe I missed something in there! Was a great book, for sure.
next

Legal | privacy