Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Microsoft are listed as a "partner" on the Renault Sport site [1], which may be a synonym for sponsor (even if that's simply providing free/reduced-price services). So yes, I would expect them to mention + promote MS services in their posts.

[1] https://www.renaultsport.com/-formule-1-partners-.html



sort by: page size:

The article mentions sponsorships.

Perhaps that's not the best place to list the sponsors.

I wasn’t able to determine who makes / sponsors this. For some reason, I thought it was Microsoft?

Crazy to see MS as platinum sponsor.

In the UK, there are thousands of local sports clubs that have links to their sponsors. You can buy these links for small sums of money. This is the same as your apache example in theory but the intention is different, it's a clear attempt to manipulate rankings while the apache links are just a side benefit. I doubt microsoft and such would care either way?

It 100% is. A mention is nothing less of an advertisement. Giving someone a mention somewhere in return for a sponsorship is simply selling an online ad.

Otherwise every company in the world could legally evade tax by calling their sales "sponsorships" and offered services as a "favour".


They seem to have sponsors that are linked on their page.

> Oracle is the principal sponsor of Red Bull racing.

Huh I would have thought the principal sponsor of Red Bull racing would be... Red Bull? Isn't that point of a naming sponsorship?


That's just advertising. They will accept sponsorship from many many companies.

I made this comment purely from my impressions of the team's major sponsors and the ones that I've noticed. Realising that I'm rather advertising blind these days (like all of us, I figure), I thought I should actually dig up a list and have more of a think about this idea.

https://formularapida.net/f1-2023-list-of-partners-sponsors-...

Safe to say, my comment above is hyperbole. Still, I wonder how many of the companies in the linked list will be considered "bad" in 10+ years.


Its not true though, as if it was then they wouldn't spend loads of money where they can still advertise.

But they do (and they sponsored F1 for a long time after most advertising was banned) so advertising must have some impact on their sales.


They also sponsored the Miami GP and have a larger sponsorship with Formula 1 and other sporting events. Not to mention the tv commercials with Matt Damon.

They have easily spent billions of dollars in marketing this year alone.


McLaren Applied Technologies is now working with and helping to attract racing team sponsors. I don't think it is a distraction so much as an aid.

I once remarked to an editor (reporter) for a tech news site (appearing occasionally on HN) that a specific channel there listed itself as specifically sponsored.

Their response: I'm glad to hear we're <doing it for money> and not <giving it away for free>.

(Using words beginning with 'W' and 'S' respectively for each concept.)


Yeah, they have the eff you money to throw around. They sponsor the McLaren F1 team as one of the primary sponsors,

https://www.mclaren.com/racing/partners/chrome/

And F1 gets hundreds of millions of viewers each year.


otoh, sponsoring developers avoids the friction between teams about how to share sponsorships etc. they should offer both though

That's sponsorship more than native advertising.

The piece itself has nothing to do with BMW and there's nothing BMW being sold under the pretence of a journalistic piece (that I could see), there's an article, and BMW sponsors the series so here's their logo.


I want to say they sponsored a NASCAR or Indycar race.

> SPONSOR CONTENT
next

Legal | privacy