It is. Censorship is not solely a government action. We have concepts everyone should be familiar with like self-censorship that don’t involve the government.
Censorship doesn't necessarily mean censorship by government. If an entity is powerful enough (Google, Facebook, etc.) they can engage in censorship just as well.
I'm just saying that there are multiple ways of having censored media. Some of which feature govt controlling said medias, some don't, some might be pure commercial, but the end result might look surprisingly the same.
This is amazing, instead of censorship being something the state does, you've talked yourself around to a position where the state can't possibly do censorship.
Governments and online communities are two very different things, and the key concern with government censorship is that there is no recourse or alternative.
reply