Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

'There is no merit in your skin color or your genitals.' can't disagree with that.


sort by: page size:

> I otherwise would have no race, right?

Yes, you don't have a race. There are no human races.


> anybody who has an argument for this must be racist

Anybody who believes people of one skin colour should be treated different than people of another is, in my books, a racist. There's no conversation to be had here.


> It it might be that I'm just racially/sexually disposed to being evil.

No, I believe your failings are on the other side of the nature/nurture divide.


> Those who object to this barbarism, inflicted upon millions of girls every year, are actually, somehow, called “racists” for doing so.

I am vehemently opposed to female genital mutilation. Even with HN's overly large number of contrarians and trolls, I claim no one can write a convincing argument that my previous sentence is in any way racist.


> Introducing skin tone provided no advantage

awfully confident take.


> Because I at least hold the ideal that we should judge people not by the color of their skin but by the content of their character

Sure, we shouldn't judge people by their skin color. That isn’t what I asked.

Lots of important elements of character are pretty immutable, too.


>it's only unambiguously correct in vacuum with no social context No it's not, lol. There is quite literally no social context where objecting to someone's given race is the correct moral choice.

> And none of this has anything whatsoever to do with the cultural concept of race.

Quite true. Race is a useless and imprecise term and it’s a pity you felt the need to start talking about it. The clustering of traits among human ancestry population groups and the reasons for that don’t need that baggage.


> Taking white dudes down a notch, I have no issue with that

Then you should have no problem dismissing the author and the content of his essay.


> It still makes you racist.

No it doesn't. It just makes you incredibly insecure.

It's not more complicated than that.


> I wasn't thinking about race

Maybe you should just appreciate having that luxury rather than criticize those who do not have it.


> Claiming there is some bias against minorities is absurd.

Have a good evening, I guess :)


> but all skin colors are equal

I'm sorry but that sentiment is anti-woke, and therefore by definition racist.


>I think what the GP meant is that if you're a young white guy

I know what he meant. I know what you mean as well. This isn't a substantive conversation on the issue. You and OP are not putting forward a cogent argument to support a position. You're making an appeal to emotion and valuing an opinion based on the skin color and gender of the person that argued it - not on its own merits.

>It looks like a much more personal attack.

And what does what you are doing look like to you?


> You think it's not problematic for people not to date black women because they are black. Only racists agree with that.

But that's not true. You can be non-racist and non-ableist but still less sexually attracted by certain body types and/or racial features. And you can be racist and at the same time attracted by them.


> Your race has nothing to do with whether or not it's a good place to work as far as happiness goes.

agreed. and I never said it did. Point to where I said that and I will send you 5 trillion US dollars. You can't, therefore I never will.


> I am African American, so there is no racism here.

That's not very convincing argument.


> I assume the opinion of someone of color would hold more weight.

So you expect me to treat you differently based on revealing your skin colour?

My personal opinion is that such an attitude will do far more harm to racial relations than the use of master / slave in technical documentation. We should be looking to make skin colour as irrelevant as eye colour. You don't get there by bringing up skin colour at every opportunity.


>> But everything about race that is poorly researched is racist.

No, it's not.

next

Legal | privacy