Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I think its one of the top ones, though i'm struggling to thikn of an area of the city that has 100 acres of greenfield to develop


sort by: page size:

Seconded - greenfield development benefits more than anything else from experience.

This, so much! Greenfield development is, in my experience, the exception, not the rule.

Where can you find greenfield or brownfield land to build a new neighborhood? My county is already converting the last two large parcels into residential.

Is it? That seems like a poor use of space that could be dense housing, commercially productive, or a wonderful park.

What is the suggested solution for Greenfield development?

You can't just go build such things in most major cities, all the available land is already developed

It's city, not agricultural terrain. There's a good chance sometime in the next 20 years the city authorities will force you to invest in it. Maybe even immediately.

There's ample unused built space, infill opportunity, or brownfields development (assuming the brown isn't overly toxic, and much is).

Lincoln Park Golf Course. Obviously it’s accessible to a lot of neighborhoods not just the wealthy one I mentioned. But when I see golf courses I think of all the affordable housing that could be built on that land.

Yeah the land is valuable. The building (and sea of parking) on it is built using last century thinking.

Rezone and densify, and build a mixed use walkable community of residential commercial and office.


100 acres of parkland and one acre of skyscraper is a much better way to meet those needs than 101 acres of suburbs.

There's a lot of buildable land. It's just not highly desirable. The land is good, and green, and the neighbors are agreeable, but it's not close to a major city.

EDIT: Case in point, my first purchase in 2017 was 5 acres of buildable land 30 minutes from a tertiary city, with an existing 900 SF manufactured home and 400 SF garage. Total price: $30,000


I believe it is a zoning problem. We need more mixed use land.

Part of the reason it's so expensive here, though, is the swath of city and county owned open space around the outskirts of town. Maybe some day it'll get developed, but I think it'll be a long time before that can happen.

While highest and best use is indeed rare, much of what appears to be vacant is so for important reasons such as utility rights of way, contaminated sites, watershed protection, or geologically unstable land. What is needed are dense clusters of development like we used to build before cars and the green city movement.

It looks like there is a golf course greater than the size of the entire city near by.

Eminent domain it and build more housing.


> just west of woodside there's hundreds of square miles of completely undeveloped land

The terrain in that area would make it quite difficult to build dense housing there - it's even steeper than the very hilly area that Woodside itself is built on. It's not that it can't be done, but it is far more expensive (think about the cost of adding infrastructure like water, sewer, etc), compared to building housing in an already developed area, like infill development on land previously zoned only for commercial purposes.


True. It is gigantic. I heard rumors that an outdoor mall operator wanted to develop the space. But it’s anyone guess. I’m sure the Wilsonville city council and others are working to not let it go undeveloped and turn into a blight.

There is plenty of land. The main bottleneck is regulatory approval. But high construction cost are also a dampening factor.
next

Legal | privacy