Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Shit, they could probably buy the whole city!


sort by: page size:

Most likely, they are already here buying up property.

They are not buying the buildings alone. They are buying loads of debt as well - and other assets which may or may not be enough to cover the debts.

They should buy up things and max out their loans...even a parking place will worth 10x there soon.

Cornering the market on an entire city seems prohibitively expensive but hey, maybe somebody will roll in with a trillion dollar investment that has massive downside someday.

How is that going to make them money? They would have to withdraw enough units to raise the market price across an entire city -- and forego the rent on all of those.

That kind of thing only makes sense if the city is imposing some kind of rent control or similar so they can't rent them out for the market rate and start getting weird incentives for rich people accounting chicanery.


I just love the city, and I'd like to buy a property there.

They can always sell their buildings, meh.

I'd love it if these developments would grant equity to its tenants. But then they'd just squat on the land, making it useless.

Is this really the best of all possible worlds, where a small number of investment groups with vast wealth can keep accumulating the core real estate of cities, to extract wealth from its citizens?


They they bought the parcels for 500 bucks a piece. Each parcel is bound to have similar recent sales from the pool of 5999. If it seems expensive to challenge for a well funded investor, it's not exactly cheap for a city that's bankrupt.

That has definitely happened before in robber baron days.

I'm curious, has it really happened at a city level? Seems to me that it would get prohibitively expensive, since other owners would see the massive demand and push up the prices, but that's really just a supposition.


If ~25% of American debt and fund market is dumped on property market, I believe they can simply buy all of the housing stock.

They wouldn't, and that's the point. They would build housing for purchase and make their profit on the sale. Pretty simple.

More like if, between them, they held almost all commercially-zoned land and then proceeded to run a landlording duopoly.

Why should the city buy them back? They sold the assets, they have no obligation to re-purchase them. Investment risk is in the hands of those people (usually companies) who purchase them. Besides, at what price would they even buy them back at? They're certainly not worth the price that some people pay for them (last I checked, about $1M each).

I live in Tampa. Investment groups with bottomless pockets are buying up whole neighborhoods.

I think if this was the case, wealthier people would swoop in and buy them up by the dozen, then rent them out for triple their mortgage. They would all be sold in bulk before the builder broke ground. Capitalism is very kind to those who already have capital.

Hopefully Buys out, Partnerships or Rents out all that Real Estate

I don't think they buy all their property. In Boston they have four locations and are planning a fifth but they're all rented / leased from property mgmt firms.

Won’t miss the money laundering they are doing by buying up all those vacant and creating a paper stream of rentals either
next

Legal | privacy