Hacker Read

malchow · 2017-11-21 18:23:01

This would seem to be a fairly monumental breach of the duty Google owes consumers.

jameslk | karma 5962 | avg karma 6.0 · | 2017-07-12 17:07:18

Wouldn't this basically be a form of economic tort? If so, I doubt Google would want to be on the receiving end of the legal consequences.

Maarten88 | karma 2593 | avg karma 4.31 · | 2013-11-06 07:46:14

They could also sue Google for this violation.

layer8 | karma 23301 | avg karma 2.59 · | 2022-07-05 16:01:07

It seems to me that Google could get into legal trouble if that was the case.

marak830 | karma 1598 | avg karma 1.77 · | 2023-05-07 04:36:16

Against googles lawyers?

It would require a massive amount of pissed off consumers, and a huge team to even drag them to court.

End result would be google paying a pittance and no one getting anything.

End of the day, a lot of lawyers would be paid well and google would shrug it off as a cost of business.

reply

gambiting | karma 29451 | avg karma 3.2 · | 2017-08-12 17:45:54

I'm willing to bet that in their hundreds and hundreds of pages of terms and conditions there is a paragraph saying that by using their services you give up your right to sue Google for war crimes.

OkayPhysicist | karma 3292 | avg karma 2.27 · | 2022-12-12 16:51:34

It might be enough to just have a class action lawsuit against Google requiring them to actually follow the actual DMCA process.

thezilch | karma 2205 | avg karma 3.16 · | 2013-08-26 16:17:46

Entitled much? What obligations does Google have here, exactly?

atmosx | karma 6099 | avg karma 1.75 · | 2018-11-26 20:38:46+00:00

Maybe you can sue Google for negligence.

piyush_soni | karma 2259 | avg karma 1.9 · | 2016-06-08 20:03:46

I would totally want this too, but legally, can Google do something here when they are not a party in this litigation?

hahainternet | karma 1457 | avg karma 1.72 · | 2012-02-08 00:45:55+00:00

In this case it is Google's responsibility.

philwelch | karma 36168 | avg karma 2.59 · | 2021-06-24 20:50:55+00:00

If Google isn’t legally liable for this under defamation statutes, maybe they should be.

notahacker | karma 21317 | avg karma 2.5 · | 2011-03-25 12:05:19+00:00

As a huge public company providing services to consumers, any damages they could conceivably win would be dwarfed by the damage to their public image by doing it (not to mention the high likelihood of the suit failing, countersuits or scrutiny of other areas of their patent portfolio they'd really rather protect)

If I held Google shares I'd actually consider it a breach of their fiduciary duty for Google's management to waste resources and goodwill pursuing a suit over something so trivial.

reply

decoyworker | karma 317 | avg karma 2.48 · | 2019-10-14 16:18:29

Violating terms or not- it's still a lot of power for Google to hold over a person and there should be some consumer protections for this.

charonn0 | karma 1954 | avg karma 2.78 · | 2021-07-16 19:15:37

This might be reasonable if the aggrieved user has a right that Google violated. But that doesn't seem to be the case.

lightedman | karma 759 | avg karma 0.49 · | 2017-09-04 20:35:19+00:00

Really sounds like some sort of RICO or extortion charge should be filed against Google, assuming this is all 100% factual.

cookiecaper | karma 15526 | avg karma 2.53 · | 2016-08-24 02:48:33

Yes. Google is violating practically every law of this type. They're allowed to do it because they have a lot of money.

marak830 | karma 1598 | avg karma 1.77 · | 2016-04-11 08:55:12+00:00

What a joke. How could Google be liable?

2OEH8eoCRo0 | karma 10664 | avg karma 1.95 · | 2022-03-27 16:21:35

I think if users could sue for this sort of thing Google would start doing that because it would be cheaper than fending off lawsuits.

chopsueyar | karma 1880 | avg karma 1.09 · | 2011-05-09 22:21:29+00:00

Google could easily sue them into oblivion for libel. They would be forced to reveal the exploit during proceedings to prove their innocence.