Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

He said C11, not C++(11).


sort by: page size:

Do you mean C++11, rather than C11?

Still, no C11. Subset of C++ my ass.

The article is about C (as in C11 standard) and not about C++ (as in C++11).

C11 isn't C++

that looks like a c++ project that uses c++11 not c11

Which is why s/he specified that the post was about c++ and not c in literally the first two words of the post :)

C, not C++.

The article is about C, not C++.

C, not C++

Just FYI: this article is about C11, not C++11. It was easier in the past when their revisions came in different years ;-)

If I'm correct he's a C programmer, not a C++ programmer.

That's C, not C++

I assumed that he switched C and C++ in that sentence.

This is C, not C++.

C++, not C :(

C++ isn't C.

You're talking about C++, he is talking about C.

That has been changed in C11 to match with C++11, in case you are not aware.

I was almost getting excited, but it's C++, not C.
next

Legal | privacy