Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Interesting idea about govt grants. Never thought of that one.


sort by: page size:

Governments also issue similar grants.

I've always wondered what government funding would look like if taxpayers could allocate their tax dollars at their own discretion. I don't think it would be all that functional in practice, but the idea of it seems interesting.

Seems like a good use of taxpayer money.

And would be a better use of the money than most other things the government does already.

Government funding.

Basically what you're saying is governments should never give grants only loans.

I think the idea is “the government should take money from projects for the greater good” … this is a concept that is 100s of years old

This is already thought about. You are hardly the first one to realize that funds can be spent on things other than what they were appropriated for. Look up the Anti-Deficiency Act.

Could pay for government spending with taxes.

Let's see: government funds for projects that have little to no regulation, oversight, or concrete goals. Yeah... good luck with that. I mean, is there any precedent for this?

And I actually like the idea!


I agree this is a good idea, but history has shown that if there is a pile of money sitting somewhere, governments blow it, just like many states have blown through public retirement funds.

The fundamental problem is that people running governments are spending other people's money and they never have a problem doing that.


Huh? How is it something that the government granted?

The government would use tax payer money for it.

If people can improve their economic performance so much with just a small cash grant then, why haven't businesses jumped in on this apparently incredible opportunity? Seems like a great chance for businesses to make some money in tandem with people reaching their potential.

Naturally it would be much better for businesses to do this than the government. Businesses have much higher motivations to use their money wisely (i.e. give the right amount to the right people and create the right incentives to ensure people are motivated to use the funds wisely, go bankrupt or get sued by investors if they spend poorly) than a government (which just gets to shrug or inflate the currency or embark on a fresh round of vilifying productive citizens).

Oh wait, don't we already have that? Bank loans or something, I don't know, lol.


Yeah the government gets the money. I hadn't thought it out completely while I was typing and just put what popped into my head.

I did take some form of economics in school but it's not something I really had a heavy interest in but I understand how it's useful.


What if the money allocated by the gov ends up creating more wealth than it would have previously? This is important to consider I think. This kind of program in my view can be a good idea if it creates more wealth than taken from the economy. I know it's unpopular to say this but government can create wealth (internet, space, health research...) that I don't think would have happened without.

I would be for such a thing if the money goes directly to people. The government doesn't spend any of it.

That sounds like one of the best uses of public funds today.

I always thought it would be a good idea to let people decide how part of their tax dollars were going to be spent. Set aside maybe 20-30% and let them choose which programs to give extra funding to. I imagine most of it would end up in education and social programs.
next

Legal | privacy