I feel like they will get sued for that extremely quickly, considering their dominating position (Chrome) and being in the ad-serving business at the same time.
This is the kind of thing that I fear will prompt a backlash from the people and government and destroy the entire online ads regime that underpins the current Internet.
Haha, imagine a company suing another for the way people use their platform, as if it’s their responsibility to police the people using it for harmful purposes! Ridiculous!
I don't see how they could be sued, even over such a comment, since I'm sure they don't make any guarantees regarding the availability of the market, much less for the ranking/search functionality. You would have to prove malice or gross negligence but I think for the latter you would need good lawyers to have a chance.
Have they ever been sued for this? I'm curious if their user agreements protect them from it at all, but when these platforms destroy people's businesses it seems like the exact reason lawsuits exist.
I'm not American, nor a lawyer, but I have read that as they offered no disclaimers of ownership of the website they were promoting, that it might be possible to challenge them.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5a/Br...
reply