Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Are you saying this would create less of an echo chamber?


sort by: page size:

it would become an echo chamber.

Won't that just turn echo chambers into even bigger echo chambers?

what you are suggesting would make the problem of echo chamber (bubble) worse than it is today!

That sounds like it would be great at creating echo chambers.

Would you say your proposal contributes to shutting off valid criticism and further reinforces echo chambers?

It will create echo chambers of similar views.

Improved echo chamber?

Doesn't that just create echo-chambers?

Doesn’t that just create echo chambers?

Additionally, isn't this just a call to create another echo chamber?

um ... ok. But the thing is I don't think this necessary so I would like some way for the echo chamber to not hold. Obviously, the ideal would be to not have the restriction. :)

That's just about adding more people to your echo chamber though isn't it?

It would stop amplifying them.

Yes, you'd get natural echo chambers of the type we've had since antiquity, but not the hugely accelerated toxic meme spread enabled by news feeds.


That sounds more interesting than what it's going to become: a massive collection of literal echo chambers.

An echo chamber?

Couldn't this simply exacerbate the very problem of echo chambers in social media?

Not really.

The echo chamber is only an issue if you isolate everything. But given the hundreds of thousands of disparate communities, blocking one or two, or even dozens of groups does not amount to much towards creating an echo chamber.


Echo chamber?

I reject your premise.

Further segregating the echo chamber of the internet is not a good thing.

next

Legal | privacy