Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Good for you but it's hard to take you remotely seriously when you try to relate SA and high quality conversation.


sort by: page size:

Certainly. For example conversation without BS snide remarks seems to be a lost art.

The hard part is when you're interesting in some things they say, but not others.

I think you may need to unlearn this conversation style before you can participate meaningfully. Vocalising your stereotypes and memorised emotional responses isn't worth much.

Some people enjoy reading such conversations. You may simply not be one of them; that's fine.

Instead of being pithy, can you hold an actual conversation?

I think it is hard to have "high quality" conversation because not only is it difficult to determine what counts as high quality but also because it is so easy for a public thread to get derailed by comments that present nuanced issues as simplistic.

Sounds like you're the one that struggles with conversation.

I'm fed up with conversations. I value altruistic softness, politeness and being sociable. But it's a shallow muddy game without the right feel or tension.

Too much time it devolves on vague if not fluff talk where people are more focused on liability rather than honesty, fun, joy or thinking.

Even with best efforts in seeking shared fun the stats are too low.


People are going to chit-chat about things only tangentially related to their areas of expertise; it is good when we’re honest about our limitations.

If nothing else, an obviously wrong take is a nice setup for a correction.


It's good to talk about things but it's not good to parrot things you can't understand.

Good discussion also benefits from pithy remarks, and suffers from bloviating.

To suggest that any conversation is more deserving of a guarantee of sincerity than any other seems bad.

Should we assume that there is an invisible man between us, transforming our words? That seems really bad to me.


Personally it’s because I find conversations full of mood and feeling kinda boring, usually very light in substance and often gossip based

Also ADHD (inattentive) for what it’s worth. I understand the problem, I’m saying this solution is ineffective and just comes off a bit bellendary


This is what I mean when I say that bad conversation drives out good.

What you call "low-quality conversation", smalltalk, is particularly disliked by people with Aspergers.

I've fallen into that SOO many times. And it's a bit transactional to ask people to lower the intellect of the conversation to help you out for a portion of the time you talk together

This site is geared towards curious, thoughtful conversation. It doesn't always live up to that goal. But that's the goal. The goal isn't to make people feel good about themselves regardless of how they behave. Talk too loud in a library, and you'll get shushed.

You might be the only one who believes a conversation loses all value if someone benefits from it, and who thus reduces an otherwise interesting discussion to "just an ad."

Noted. This is the kind of answer I was looking for, I'm not too far off the mark. I could do better though.

I'm trying to mold myself from the wisdom of this community little by little. I just want to build something of value, that makes life more fulfilling for the people who use my platform. I try not to talk about it unless the conversation drifts towards 'what are you working on?'. At that point, I mention what it is in bare bones terms and that's it.

Also I've learned that people react differently based on their feelings about themselves. Talking to people who are happy with themselves, they like to hear more and we go back and forth. Other times, people change the subject to sports or weather.

next

Legal | privacy