Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

If you're not doing much/any text encoding, guessing graphics/VFX is not, then upgrading is pretty painless these days.


sort by: page size:

Yet. It's much easier to upgrade software than hardware.

Except upgrading incrementally if you can is easier. Less things to change all at once.

True, but I guess it'll be a surprise to many. And, unfortunately, upgrading isn't always the easiest thing with deprecations and stuff

You'll want to upgrade to produce generative content - you just don't know it yet.

Upgrade? You mean re-write.

No news is good news, so it's fine to upgrade without any changes.

The upgrade isn't that bad. Nowhere near going 2.x to 3.x.

Easy until you try to upgrade.

But upgrades are free.

And here I was considering finally upgrading. Good to know.

They released minimum system requirements specifically so that you wouldn't have to upgrade 9 months down the road.

It's always amazing to see companies make upgrading harder than moving to their competitors.

Great reasons to upgrade.

But they should also mention they are taking away our beloved print and quick string formatting.


Yeah, the forced upgrade isn't bad. The low quality of the new version is bad.

Companies don't usually put off upgrading for lack of money, rather all the outdated internal software that will have to be fixed.

I'd be happy with cherry picking out all the marketing/semi-literate pop culture influences making a mess of it, but that's just as unlikely as any kind of upgrade.

If you haven't upgraded your packages in 10 years, you've got nothing to worry about ;)

Something can still be an upgrade for the vast majority even if it doesn't do 100% of the same stuff as it's predecessor...

But it's also assuming everyone has a desktop PC capable of this stuff that can be upgraded.
next

Legal | privacy