Could you please elaborate rather than giving a drive-by dismissal?
I'm explaining the fraud angle that everyone is concerned about.
Of course, if Tether works exactly as the Tether corporation claims (but has yet to prove) then there's nothing to see here. Seems that they would be quick to try to prove this to regulators, though.
WELL, do note that this is about an infraction that occurred in mid-2018, LONG after the "ardent HODL-ers" were skeptical about it and while Tether had its highest level of confidence in the market, instead of like 2016.
So it is almost like a caricature of its own criticisms.
I'm not really seeing much evidence for this other than this tweet. And the site seems to be working fine. I want to watch Tether go boom as much as the next guy, but this one might be fake news.
The claims I have seen from you and from e.g. Sam Trabucco amount to basically "Tether is legit because we create and redeem tethers regularly." This is not real evidence, in the same way that "Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC is legit because I deposit and withdraw funds regularly" is not real evidence.
The claim is that Tether isn't backed by enough dollars to cover the number of Tethers in existence. There could still be a bunch of dollars in the bank.
The conspiracy theory is an extreme exaggeration on what has been admitted, which I believe is - at one point - reserves of 77 percent of liabilities, and even that admission I'm not certain about given how much any news about Tether is misconstrued by the regulatory crowd.
reply