Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

It's plausible that the computer would be in focus at that location as it is at the same distance from the camera as the main subject in the picture (and therefore shares the focus plane).

The transition is too hard though, and the screen illumination is ridiculous.



sort by: page size:

When I look at my screen, only a part of it is in focus. The computer doesn't need to know where I'm looking; my eyes are blurring those other bits for me.

Wouldn't that only work when it has focus?

it also switches focus window, which is makes things even more confusing

Perhaps the focus is always like 5 feet in front of you?

Are you serious? Click where ever you want to focus the shot

It could be an onFocus as well, I presume.

Re (1), the guy in the video gives a couple demonstrations of focusing everything in an image. It seems reasonable to assume it could be automated, if that's what you're asking.

And for what it's worth, the just-one-design thing has worked out pretty well for Apple.


That's asking the camera to try to focus, not setting the focus remotely. I'd like the thing to work as a software focus puller for video.

Then why do it? If that's not a focus problem, I don't know what would be.

It is, you could mess it up if it lost focus if I recall.

It's got "Focus Pixels" man! You'd be crazy not to!

According to the RS Components page [0] it appears to be fixed focus.

[0] http://uk.rs-online.com/web/generalDisplay.html?id=raspberry...


Yes, but I strongly prefer for focus to follow the mouse

ah, yes, but since there's no focus indicator it's not obvious

Good Points. Maybe something like a Lytro-Focus-slider could be implemented.

Front/back and Flash can be adjusted on the panel I the left.


That article is talking about focus follows mouse.

Which I fail to see how is applicable for a touchscreen device which has no concept of focus.


A workaround is to detach the tab and keep it visible. Then it doesn't need to be focused.

I'm guessing the issue is that there would be few (1?) focus points available; people are used to much finer grained auto-focus capabilities. That being said...maybe uBeam can find a use for their tech now :-)

https://liesandstartuppr.blogspot.com/search/label/ubeam


I thought so too. But apparently that doesn't give you a _point focus_, rather a square focus, which doesn't work.
next

Legal | privacy