Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Yes, I know. They aren't going to change that position voluntarily. I strongly suspect that state intervention is inevitable.


sort by: page size:

Agree, it's going to require regime change.

I am sure they are due for a regime change for oppressing their people at some point in the future.

Aren't you assuming the implied change of power mentioned in the parent comment will come at the hands of a rational actor/state? That seems fraught with hindsight, no?

I assume they won't change it because they are afraid of what the other side will do when they are in power.

To me, this reads like they're declaring their own ability to carry out acts of war in sovereign states at will, as their only recourse will be force.

Ah. But that is expecting action from a reigning government that has proven itself unable to do literally anything forward-thinking. It’s regression all over.

The people don't have a choice, and the leaders want to maintain control. if they maintain control, and growth continues for a while, I think they are okay with it.

sounds like they're taking all measures so their people can't organize an uprising and overthrow the government.

The incoming regime will push for it, no doubt.

Do you seriously believe they don't bend to political pressure nor operate under their own political leanings when making such decisions?

They are definitely aligned with the desire of autocracies. They may not realize it, but doesn't mean it's not the case.

Yeah, I don't doubt someone is going to try "regime change" there.

It will not "end" any government involvement. That's just the spin.

Well, you have to make an assumption either way. I'd say it's more likely they'll do what they've done in the past than not, particularly where the status quo of power structures is threatened.

Demoralization and destabilization are their goals with respect to meddling though. See my rather long reply to parent in this thread.

I don't think it's a conspiracy but I don't think there is a plan to implement their aims without democratic oversight.

My gut instinct is that this is a nation-state initiated.

As near I can tell it is an arbitrary decision of an authoritarian government that is too deep into sunk cost to reverse course.

> Attempts to change/form their views to be favourable towards dictatorships and antagonistic to democracies.

If that's the claim, the reality is they are doing the opposite.

You need to provide proof, not speculation.

next

Legal | privacy