Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> No magic ;)

Well you need to know that they refer to columns in the car's body in the first place.



sort by: page size:

> The car serves you.

Physics serves no one. It is.


> This is more akin to saying that before someone drives they should know about the accelerator, brake and steering wheel, the basic tools

No, this is something in between, but an analogous system does not exist in cars. If cars had trim, like airplanes, that might be analogous.


> is incredibly heavy and so sticks to the ground

That's... that's not how cars work.


> There are less possible atomic configurations for cars then their is for debris.

That doesn't really line up logically. :/


> Whether I'm driving a Ferrari or an Aston Martin, I still have no idea what goes on under the hood

Maybe if you're just a casual driver that's fine. What if you happen to be a race driver? What if you need to drive in snow, on ice, on sand, at high altitude? It's suddenly a good idea if you have some idea how the car actually works. What if your boss says to you, "We need you to drive 15% faster with 10% less gas", and you open the hood and there's just a big box there labelled "magic" that can't be opened?


> So it is no surprise that any type of work on the seats puts this system in an error state.

It's only not surprising if you already know a ton about cars, which is a terrible definition of "surprising" to use here.


> only 10%

That does not mean anything. A car's engine contains only 10% of the parts in that car.


> One is critical vehicle functionality

Except it isn't. Can you start or continue driving without any of that info? Then it isn't critical.

Critical functionality is:

- steering

- drivetrain

- brakes

- tyres


>how a car works

Spinning levers, obviously...


> The ABS cannot overcome the laws of physics.

Is this the cute part? My car's manual from 2015 has practically the same wording, and it looks more like a fact than a joke or reference.


> Cars do not need that skill.

As a driver, I can certainly sense my car smelling funny if something goes wrong :)


>The battery and motors go under the body, not in front of it.

Doesn't that strike you as a rather large change? Significantly changing the center of mass on multiple axes and the allocation of space within the body of the car seems like a pretty big deal as far as the design of a car goes. And that's ignoring the fundamental differences in characteristics between an ICE and an electric motor and what effects that and the different placement has on the drive train and other systems.


> Behind the wheel is the radio control, which is actually standard for a Renault car.

I’ve yet to find radio control on the steering wheel. The inly controls behind yhe wheel are colume up/down and mode (IIRC), whatever mode means.

No way to cycle through radio stations or change tracks.


>There isn't enough surface area on vehicles for that to happen.

Yeah, it's the old square-cube law in action.


>Most of the problems in any moving vehicle come from stuff close to the ground

Is this based on your intuition or is there more to it? The DoT tracks automobile issues and it looks like the top ones are engine, engine cooling, other power train, air bags, and brakes. [1]

[1] https://www.nhtsa.gov/data


> I know my car only applies brakes to the front wheels.

If that's true, your car needs urgent brake maintenance. Most cars' brakes are forward biased, and all cars apply brakes to all wheels.


>> Those are the easy parts because all 3 run off of hydraulics and electricity. As long as they get power supplied to them, they all just work.

Except the heat in your car is transferred from the coolant running through your engine. Which is why the 'heat' in your car doesn't work until you've been driving it for a little bit.

>> Brakes don't even need power, I believe, and can work purely mechanically.

Brakes definitely need power. Have you even driven an older car without power brakes or steering? There's a reason they used to have much larger steering wheels in cars. And most of your brakes are hydraulic with vacuum assist. Turn your ignition off (in a large parking lot) and try to steer or brake your car! The brakes will work once or twice...

You would need to add electric power steering to an older car. You can convert over a Volvo system, get an electric pump, or do it a few other ways.

>> That's generally an issue with high labor costs and not the car industry in particular.

I'm talking just parts. For example, you need a control pack from Ford which contains the ECU and wiring harness which is nearly two thousand dollars, and aftermarket systems aren't even cheaper.

https://www.jegs.com/i/Ford+Performance/397/M-6017A504VB/100...


> If you use the manual control, it won’t lower the window, which can cause damage.

On a Tesla. Other cars, mostly with similar frameless windows, have this same functionality and have had it for at least the last 15 years and they do so with mechanical releases.


> they often aren't.

This was NOT my experience while working in the automotive industry.

next

Legal | privacy