Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Nope! Willful misunderstanding of what I've written makes him a dishonest actor, as it also does you!


sort by: page size:

Wait.. taking the context of your post into consideration makes him a dishonest actor?

I think you're lying, maliciously, on purpose.

I do not presume good faith. You are a bad actor.

If this isn't true, edit your post to apologize to D. Richard Hipp for lying about him.


I don't... think so? He clearly intended to create a deceptive document, and wrote separately that it was false (don't delete this, wink wink, nudge nudge). The director didn't hold a gun to his head.

> I'm not sure how you think that's not a dishonest thing to do.

I've found that such folks fall into one of three categories.

(1) He's doing this for the attention. (2) He's incompetent. (3) He's lying to discredit his supposed cause.


Why would he post a dishonest statement?

He's an actor and a sociopath, he can fake sincerity and humility. Don't be fooled into thinking he suddenly has them.

Even if all he did was correct a typo, he hid it, that's dishonest

True, and that is why I didn't write 'A judge recently called him a "liar"'.

He's answering a "do you feel" question. You can't possibly know if he's being dishonest.

Are you calling him a liar?

Do you really think he's being honest?

I think he false-flagged the script.

So are you calling him a liar or not?

He's been lying. He practically wrote a book about it and lied about that part. You invented the part about forced apologies - I didn't say that.

I agree, for the most part, but what other reason or intent would you have in inserting deliberate errors than to be duplicitous or fraudulent? His best bet would have just been to let the script do its thing for as long as he could until he was asked about it. Chances are he never would have been asked and would have been commended for his accuracy. Now, though, he's totally on the hook for fraud if this ever comes out.

It sounds like you're suggesting he both lies, and acts with disingenuity. I don't think it's reasonable to ask him to do that.

I didn't mean to suggest that he is a compulsive liar or is a bad person, but I think it's deceitful to pass assumptions off as facts. I don't know whether he is specifically referring to making things up (which I see as deceitful and thus lying), asserting assumptions as truth (which I see is a gray light), or simply being wrong. Being wrong is one thing. If I tell you 2+2=5 and you tell someone else thinking that it's a fact, then you aren't acting intentionally in your deceit. If you just start making assumptions on your own and assert them as truth, I feel like that takes a certain amount of effort in a dishonest direction.

No, you speculated that Alex's post was dishonest, since your "speculations" directly contradicted numerous things he actually said.

I concluded a few months ago that writing like yours (not yours in particular; it's an annoying HN trope) is actually more rude than a similar comment that outright called the author a liar. You not only did that, but in such a way as to imply that he lies so often it's a casual affair. "Of course", the sentiment you're expressing goes, "there's more to the story than he's telling us. Why would he tell us anything but what makes him look good?" That's what you've communicated.

Alex, I am 1000% sure, does not give a shit about what you (or I) think about his most recent career move. But comments like yours, as you can see, drive me up a fucking wall.


yep he should have used the word dishonest or flat out lying...
next

Legal | privacy