Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

In addition to this, they've also locked the ability for users to vote for this feature so even if you do sign in, you can't vote for end to end encryption to be implemented.


sort by: page size:

According to the article, users can opt-in to end-to-end encryption, so it's not true that this is "out of our control".

Sadly this doesn't work with end-to-end encryption enabled.

I don't see anything in their site about end to encryption?

End to end encryption is not a feature most regular users even understand, let alone want.

According to the article, they don't yet have end-to-end encryption yet. It's still under development.

Doesn’t help if people are using end-to-end encryption.

No end to end encryption is deal breaker for most.

It says "connection is encrypted" in the current version. No mention of end-to-end whatsoever.

of course they don't want end-to-end encryption because then they won't be able to look at your data...

>One other major downside of end-to-end encryption: everything has to be done client-side, and the server becomes very close to a dumb pipe and block storage.

That sounds like a feature...


no end to end encryption?

And they really dont want anyone using good end to end e encryption for the same reason ;-)

Not having end to end encryption is sad.

That seems to completely defeat the point of it being end to end encrypted in the first place.

It wouldn't be controversial if they explicitly stated that, and took "End-to-end encryption for all meetings" off of their features page.

End to end encryption seems like an endless pain in the ass. So many expected features like server side searching and link embeds become basically impossible to do in a secure way.

End-to-end encryption should mean that the cloud provider doesn't have access to the key to decrypt the data.

That kind of doesn't work if you have end-to-end encryption turned on.
next

Legal | privacy