Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I was wondering the same but for Apache Beam. I don't think it's to get traffic. Just coincidence.


sort by: page size:

Yeah I was wondering that too.

Maybe it's mainly for competitors to apache ...


Slightly off topic: Why might be the reason Apache Traffic Server usage hasnt caught on?

Thanks, didn't see that one. That said, it seems work has slowed down to a trickle, and I'm not seeing much activity on the Apache end.

I don't get it...

What's the surprise in having a cluster of 8 Pi serve 45k hits a month? That's 25 hits per hour, a single Pi would do it. Plus, Apache..?


I guess to provide a useful web server, faster and more efficient than apache.

Not sure. Apache always has several projects that do the same thing for one reason or another. Usually they're projects from competing organizations like Google and Facebook.

> Apache Traffic Server is under-appreciated as a large file cache. Used as an edge Docker pull-through cache to improve cold starts & as a CDN cache to lower our S3 bill.

I would love to know more!


Probably Apache Traffic Server

And because they're using Apache where, due to a combination of the still-common forking process model and KeepAlive, they get exciting OOM events if 20 people click on a link simultaneously.

also, note Apache prepended every time. Can't help thinking there is concentration risk there.

Yes, but since it's Apache, anything like this is big news.

Interesting - how can the trend seen in those charts be explained? The clearly falling popularity of Apache the larger the website and clearly rising popularity of Nginx complement each other nicely.

It seems more like they are deployed behind load balancers, because load balancing is a specific job that it makes sense to do with a separate piece of software. Admittedly, that separate piece of software is often nginx, but there are other popular options, and I don't think very many people use Apache that way (though I could be wrong).

Apache has been doing this since there was an Apache.

Yeah I wonder why they didn't go with Apache or MIT

I think Apache forces some sort of Server header too.

This is a good thing. Apache is a swiss-army chainsaw of last-resort, not a minimal webserver.

I presume the native-american name is supposed to reference the Apache project. When I saw the name, that's what I assumed.

Because it's really easy to integrate it with Apache and this will solve some performance issues. If you use it a lot you might get annoyed by some pages loading too slow otherwise.
next

Legal | privacy