Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

I'd love to see that. When a video surfaced a few years back, of the Santa Ana riverbed behind the Big A in Anaheim, it was much easier to share the video with family and friends who were unfamiliar than it was to try to explain what I was seeing (I stopped into that particular tent city a couple of times searching for an ill family member who contends with bouts of homelessness).


sort by: page size:

I would be curious to see a picture of where the underground river emerges.

Any river would work. An interesting application for LA or the Bay area

Would love to see that upstream!

I just watched an incredibly moving video about traveling down the Colorado river: https://vimeo.com/126544483


I wonder if just street viewing down the river would lead you to them

For those with a nebula subscription, there's an hour-and-a-half documentary on the Colorado River here: https://nebula.app/thecoloradoproblem

If you could animate it the flow might look like it bounces off the west coast and heads back inland. Technically, cities are infestations of humans.

That would be the Colorado river. I did a trip like that two summers ago (on rafts rather than kayaks), and there's (essentially) no communication with the outside world. I did think about how I would react if there were some major world event, but I can only imagine what it feels like for them.

Imagine this filled with churning whitewater: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/USA_1009...

You're not coming out alive.


These were featured in Human Planet documentary series ( Rivers ). Well worth a look.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Planet


This just makes me picture big pipelines following (in reverse) the course of the natural watershed... some desal plants off the coast of S.F. or Marin peninsulas with pipes in through the Golden Gate and up the river delta and fanning out towards Sacramento and south to Fresno etc.

Again, please indicate the likely route you think they would have taken. Which waterways?

> When it rains all those white river shaped things turn into rivers that you can float logs down.

You are conjecturing. I've seen wet arroyos. They are not like the image you've shown with the nice flat water.

Here's what it looks like: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=obrgK17L1UM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmO0xzXapeg and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZ40m2SoBWM and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l1PTLOp_hUs .

These are short-lived events. You are not going to pole a raft 50+ miles upstream during that time in that flow.

Yes, they can be enough to carry logs downstream. But they'll also easily snag, and be abraded.

> As long as the current is relatively weak it's easy to move a boat by pole.

Why do you think the water flow in NM arroyos, in those rare times when the water is deep enough to float a log, is "relatively weak"?

In NM there are a lot of warnings to stay out of arroyos when it rains, because the water can come quickly, with a dangerous flow.

For example, from https://www.koat.com/article/officials-urge-residents-to-sta...:

] LT. CHRIS CARLSEN WITH THE ALBUQUERQUE FIRE DEPARTMENT SAYS IT ONLY TAKES INCHES OF WATER IN AN ARROYO TO SWEEP YOU AWAY. Carlsen: "It doesn't seem very dangerous when it's hot and dry but it takes a very small amount of rain in the foothills or mesa to fill these channels up quickly." AND WHEN IT POURS AND THOSE ARROYOS FILL UP - THE WATER MOVES FAST AND GETS DEEP. LOOK AT WHAT THE WATERS HAVE DRAGGED DOWN THE CHANNEL, ALREADY THIS SEASON: Carlsen: "You can see the water can move concrete. We've had forklifts, vehicles come washing down the system." IF A PIECE OF HEAVY MACHINERY IS NO MATCH FOR THE RUSHING WATER ... NEITHER ARE YOU

> You don't need much more than a few inches to float logs.

To repeat the previous quote, "IT ONLY TAKES INCHES OF WATER IN AN ARROYO TO SWEEP YOU AWAY."

You can work out how a rough minimum required depth.

The paper says their test log is 22 cm in diameter = 8.6 inches and "timbers of at least 0.61 m diameter were used at Chaco as vertical support columns in great kivas", so 24 inches.

Pine greenwood appears to have a density about 700 kg/cubic meter so it looks the test log needs 5-6 inches of depth and the vertical support columns need about 1.5 feet. (I used the greenwood weight since you're going to waterlog the pine anyway. The dried density is only about 400 kg/cubic meter.)

That's a lot of water in dry New Mexico!

Oh, and your hypothesis requires that each one of the "white river shaped things" is that inches deep, to be able to float logs. They merge into the Coyote Wash, so that would be carrying a huge volume of water. But looking at the aerial pictures you can see it's never had regular huge flows like that.

Aslo, there's about a 600 foot rise from where Coyote Wash meets the Cacho River to Chaco Canyon proper, so there's a decent river flow. (A flow you saw in the photograph.)

In Three Men in a Boat they punt the Thames from Kingston upon Thames to Oxford. That's 100 miles, and a rise of <200 feet. This stretch of the Cacho Wash is 600 feet in 50 miles, so about 6x the slope, and thus a rather faster current than the Thames.

> How many examples are there of them choosing to carry heavy stuff when water transport was available?

That doesn't answer my question. If no one brought tens of thousands of logs upstream 50 miles by water using only manual labor than your appeal to history is bad logic. If you can't show people did it, you can't appeal to history.

Further, you've yet to demonstrate that appropriate water transport was available to the Chaco Canyon dwellers.

Further, the paper cites the archeological evidence that "that the people of Chaco used tumplines to carry a variety of materials (water vessels, maize, ceramics, chert, obsidian, turquoise, cacao, and even macaws) across a trading network spanning the San Juan Basin and beyond."

What evidence is there for your proposed transport method?


I was on a road trip throughout a lot of different parts of America last month. A park ranger in Big Bend told me that a tributary creek of the Rio Grande was a hundred feet wide, when normally you can just jump over it. A lakeside highway rest area in North Carolina was flooded up to a permanently mounted bench and trash can.

Maybe people live downstream?

Yes, I would as long as it's a natural river in chronological order.

Imagine a big ass river. Pretty much the same concept, but in reverse.

You mean the Los Angeles river?

There's no river, but I found this. http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/sbw/5642724453.html
next

Legal | privacy