Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Apple didn't make the first magnetic connector. It was already common for fondue sets. The patent is about Apple's particular implementation.

I suppose it wouldn't be that hard to work around if people really wanted to.



sort by: page size:

In short, that's because Apple flat-out refuses to license the patent to anyone.

Never mind that magnetic power connectors had already been invented, and that Apple's patent is essentially another "this already existing thing except on a computer" patent.


The magnetic power connector is patented. Apple doesn't license it, and a respectable manufacturer won't want to infringe it.

And Apple got the idea for magnetic break-away connectors on tabletop deep fryers. It should not have been patentable.

It won't be patented by Apple. Which is a hindrance to a 'universal' connector design. Of course Apple started patenting its connectors in part to give it a weapon against inferior cable/accessory makers (or so I'm told).

I've seen these magnetic power cords on water boilers for a long time. We got one from Asia in the 90s. http://www.zojirushi.com/products/cvdyc

That may have merited a patent (if it wasn't already invented, and I suspect it was), but Apple's implementation does not.


Microsoft having a patent on a magnetic connector of their own is unrelated to the question of whether that connector infringes Apple's patent.

Wait, why does Apple even have the power to do this...?

It's a connector... Why on earth is it possible to patent a connector that doesn't involve any particular innovation (take wires, rearrange a bit, tweak shell shape) in the first place...?!?


Hypothetically speaking, if Apple had a patent on the 'magnetic power adaptor' and discontinued it in their own products, would this mean that nobody could produce such a thing. That seems like it would be a ludicrous situation.

There were rumors Apple patented this a year or so ago.

You can’t patent an idea like “magnetic alignment”, only specific implementations. There are many possibly implementations.

Apple has many patents in this space, for instance US 10804748.


Does Apple have a patent on this, or is it just not novel enough to warrant it?

They can't; Apple has a patent on Magsafe.

Apple definitely has a patent on that. (I'm not exactly sure how patents work, but they filed one on Magsafe as late as 2017)

Wasn't apple using patents to stop modding of their magsafe cables?

Re 6: Apple has a patent for magnetic charger connections. Whether Apple isn't willing to license the patent or other manufacturers aren't willing to pay to license it I don't know.

Re 1: Absolutely true, and it's something that might make me go back to a mac (from Ubuntu) in the future.


It was invented long ago, one of the reasons that Apple lost the patent was that there was prior art.

I think Apple has a patent

I am guessing they have licensed magsafe from Apple. Pretty sure they would get a call from Apple lawyers otherwise. There are universal chargers and batteries with all sorts of connectors which are not patent encumbered.

Kind of makes me wonder if Apple would cooperate at this stage and then consider buying the company later.


Maybe they tried that. but Apple had patent on that.
next

Legal | privacy