Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

> "everything gravitates around everything else"

for thing in solar_system: thing.gravitate_around(everything_else.center_of_mass)



sort by: page size:

> The earth is not a point, nor is the moon or any other body.

From a gravitational perspective, this doesn’t matter as long as you’re outside of the body: you can treat the object as a point mass located where the center was.


I'm pretty sure the definition would include having the sun as the major gravitational force acting on the object.

> Deep space [added: after seeing Gravity]

Gravity takes place in near space, and it gets most of the gravity quite wrong.


> Any contiguous fluid surrounding a solid body will form a sphere around the system's center of gravity.

Did you just disprove tides?


> has nothing to do with motion and gravitation.

Oh but it does. (The force of gravity is essential for some (al)chemical techniques.)


> an ellipse in a circular gravity field coming from a point mass.

Even if you consider the point mass to move because of the mutual attraction?


> diddled random neighbours ever-so-slightly closer to each other over a few million iterations

Isn't that gravitation?


> A statistical model of orbits, without a theory of gravity

You want a statistical model that produces a theory of gravity.


> Isn't gravity just a fundamental force?

Not really.

     Gravity is most accurately described by the general theory of relativity... which describes gravity not as a force, but as the curvature of spacetime, caused by the uneven distribution of mass, and causing masses to move along geodesic lines.[1]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity

Phycisist :

> F = G * m1 * m2 / r**2

Computer scientist:

    nonrelativistic_gravitational_force = ( 
      Physics.NonRelativistic.Gravity.gravitational_constant 
      * body1.NonRelativistic.mass() 
      * body2.NonRelativistic.mass() 
      / body1.NonRelativistic.distanceTo(body2) ** 2
    )*

article goes on to state that gravitational pull effects surrounding objects without touching them, you know, like how we already know every fucking planet works?

quantum physics: the biggest waste of time since philosophy


1g towards Earth's center. Well, center of mass.

:adjusts bow tie:

Welllll…combination of that and angular momentum. Combined with the masses of the sun, and the moon, the other planets, and all the other masses of the universe.

Fortunately, orbits factor in, too. Everything that orbits is essentially in free fall, wellll…until they get tooo eliptical and the oscillating accelerations get really noticeable.

And it all affects time. Time is a bunch of wibbly-wobbly…stuff.

(( Ok, ok: Matt Smith might not have been that wordy as The Doctor. ))


Gravity probably works exactly the same throughout the entire universe.

> Gravity IS space

More accurately, gravity is the curvature of spacetime.


> You might as well say that gravity has nothing to do with up and down.

Gravity doesn’t have anything to do with up and down. It deals with mass and center points.

It only appears as up and down to you on earth.

Probably a lesson in there somewhere.


> Gravity isn’t a force in general relativity.

More importantly, GR has nothing to say about forces at all.


> why apple always fall towards the earth but not earth towards an apple?

But it does.


"This mysterious force that pulls everything down and causes so much mischief"

The mischief of beeing tied to this celestial body and not being able to float in space?


My surroundings don’t remain the same:

The fact that mathematics is accurately replicating the semantics of gravitation is why we got to the moon — that model was projected back into reality as the rocket’s trajectory; via a computer directly mediating the translation of model into rocket parameters.

And it worked.

next

Legal | privacy