Well, to be fair, he contributed $1000 to a huge real-life fucking hate mob.
Ramble on about 'SJWs' or 'cancel culture' or whatever if you like, but the fact is that social actions have social consequences, and this is an example.
This guy is a nutcase trying his best to destroy a revolutionary movement and one of the few tools left for the individual to fight corporate domination. Flagged for being a paid attack.
So the person who claims to care about his own community doesn’t put his money where his mouth is, but gets to joke about a marginalised minority who in their overwhelmingly majority support racial equality (because they themselves are an oppressed minority and overwhelmingly liberal) in the name of defending his community (instead of attacking those who actually do the violence), and that is unrelated to his actions and behaviour because … ?
Clear it up for me, how are his actions congruent with what he claims he does?
It's not just his tweets, likes, or his support of Trump. It's proven in detail now that he is actively funding a fringe alt-right group that peddles bigoted/racist/xenophobic crap.
Most of us want to live in a world that says this is not ok.
Founder supported trolls who hijack conversations with white supremacist memes, then explained that support by declaring, “Money is not my issue. I thought it sounded like a real jolly good time.”
Honestly this Bhattacharya fellow seems either monumentally stupid or monumentally brave. In today’s left-aligned milieus like academia, challenging whatever is coming out of the racial outrage industry is like spitting on Kim Il-Sung’s statue in Pyongyang.
reply