Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

Since they deployed the new user interface it became unusable. The old UI was lighter, faster and more intuitive/usable.


sort by: page size:

The new UI is uneccessary and incomplete. The old UI was a fine flat, plain design ala Goole. The new UI lacks many features of the old and feels more clunky; it should not have been enabled yet.

At least on desktop the old UI has a bug in narrow browser windows, but besides that I also use it 99% of the time. The new interface simply doesn't bring any noteworthy value in comparison while being more annoying to use.

The new ui is unusable in my opinion. I dare them to get rid of the old interface.

I also liked the old UI far better. I have trouble finding things and navigating to where I want to go in the new UI. In the old UI it was easier to get an overview and to see where I have to click.

Liked the old UI better :(

Well... the old UI is perfectly good at it. The new UI not so much.

The look of the UI is now fewer functional than before DOS.

old interface was just way more information dense. That's my main complaint with new UI. Even with "compact" mode on the new UI, it's not as dense as the old one.

Yup, noticeably much much slower than the old interface, while seemingly also not changing functionality or layout at all. What was the point?

Agree.

New UI is just a cool animation, but it is unreadable on a 4K 32-inch screen.

Old UI is intuitive and doesn't require 10 pages of instructions and you can actually see numbers and labels all the time.


Because users are accustomed to the Previous Version. They have various specific ways of doing things. Your new UI breaks it, so now the user has to spend time readjusting their habits. It gets even worse if there is no simple, obvious way to re-establish the old workflow.

I agree, i found the UI changes to be a real downgrade to what was a perfectly usable service. Just the other day i was trying to track down an error and it took me about 10 minutes to track down the right page.

It feels like a real mess now.


I love the old interface. The new one is impossible for me to use. I can't read a thing on it.

It wasn't just slow and clunky, it changed how to do basic things, split configuration between about three different places, and changed defaults (which they still frequently do, to the point that it is still on-going and my "go-back-to-sane-defaults" script is now pages long)

The best UI is one the users already know. Changing to get more users only to lose your existing ones is a massive failure.


Wasn't the user interface fundamentally changed after the open source release because it was so cumbersome to use?

I agree... the old interface was a menu. i didn't like it very much.

I'm not a UX expert and don't have the vocabulary to describe what's wrong with it. What I know is that I used to enjoy using it. Not just for directions, but I'd use it for fun to explore new areas. And now I dislike and avoid using it altogether. Similar to Gmail. It's just feels like a mess of UI elements that show and hide and move dynamically, don't have fixed spots on the page, don't work consistently, etc. Like it was excessively focus-grouped or committee-designed.

I know how to get directions in the new interface. I just don't like doing it. Is it more clicks? More elements taking up space I don't care about? Hijacking the native right-click menu? Aggressive resizing/panning when I didn't ask for it, to accommodate what it thinks the new context should be? I don't really know.


The people I know use it a lot less after the design update, most of them just can't be botheres to learn a whole new UI.

Well the old interface is ugly. But the new interface is ugly and less ergonomic.
next

Legal | privacy