Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

VMs do have a place for that now: many shops run thin clients into a cluster for workstation uses.


sort by: page size:

I'm glad it worked for you in a personal setting. I know having VMs with thin clients is pretty common in office settings and schools, but I'm guessing they have dedicated hard- and software for it (Citrix I believe? It's been a while)

So, your users aren't working on traditional "Desktop PC" instances anymore, but inexpensive terminal clients that connect to a backend Hypervisor running on a server? I've been waiting to see when companies would start doing that "en masse" - back in 1999/2000, I thought it was going to take off when Sun was promoting the Thin Client Concept. Then VMWare took it up - but, for some reason, I never saw it get any traction, and the vast majority (Well, in my experience, all) companies seemed to go the other direction (countering where my instincts thought we were going to go) - and started issuing everyone laptops. The exact opposite of thin clients connected to servers. I had to eat a lot of claim chowder.

If I'm understanding your situation correctly, how do your thin clients work out in practice, and, how do people deal with scenarios in which they would normally use laptops? (Business Trips, Airplane Flights, etc...)


That's what VMs are for.

That's what VMs are for.

Or VMS even.

Yep, used for development work so many VMs and such.

I always preferred VMWare workstation anyway. The downside is its harder to install a small easy VM on work PCs.

VMware can do the same.

Vmware workstation... :)

I use VMs mainly as development machines, back in the days in a server locally, nowadays mostly in Azure/AWS mainly to separate clients / software.

It is a great idea when your production environment is a VM.

I'm working with a number of clients that are doing this. Either an outsourced vmware horizon deployment or Windows Virtual Desktop. Local hardware is only thin clients. No servers in-house, no desktops, no laptops. It isn't as good as local hardware, but it's good enough for most business applications and even video conferencing.

Yes or at least VM's :)

Not even business, since 2011 on the projects I worked on, the workstations if needed, were always some beefy cloud VM.

Some providers do real machines via the same interface as VMs.

Where I work, they used to give you desktop computers (pre Covid) for the workstation purpose, but post-covid they just provision a VM for you. Honestly, its probably cheaper in short-term and only mildly more expensive long term. No real IT work needed (since <cloud provider> handles the hardware), and automatic upgrades if more ram/GPU/etc is needed. Even a really big VM ($80/m) wouldn’t be crazy compared to the logistics of managing/storing/powering/networking a bunch of desktops across an office.

WorkSpaces are popular for big companies that use VDI to manage their workstations.

Or you could use VMS.

There are of course many VMs out there. Totally depends on the individual use case.
next

Legal | privacy