Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

There needs to be another vote.


sort by: page size:

That's what the article is calling for, another vote. Presumably their parliament would have to authorize it--the same as they did the first vote.

Let’s vote on it.

A vote.

7 more votes to get it done.

The votes will decide.

Did he propose a vote this time? I must have missed that.

It will only be brought up again if there's a chance that the representatives you vote for will back it.

At this point, it has two votes.

They still have a vote

And if the second vote fails, do you have a third and a fourth vote? Until the outcome is desired?

When will this be voted on?

They should have voted on it!

Not necessarily - the second vote could be a ratification of outcome the first, rather than a repeat of the question.

That's too close. I hope they can have another debate and vote about just these two options.

This is important:

> Mitch McConnell (R-KY) switched his vote at the last minute. He submitted a motion to reconsider the vote following the defeat. A new vote may be set for later on Wednesday.

So while it didn't advance this morning, it will likely come up for another vote later today. It hasn't been "rejected" per se, but has at least experienced a (potentially short) setback.


This is not a one time vote. This is voting over a significant period of time and powers are not fixed.

I suspect when the dust settles, after a couple of years of agonizing negotiations, there will be a push for another vote that will not pass.

It's being voted on today and tomorrow, make these days count.

When is it to be voted on?
next

Legal | privacy