Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

>> This law is really terrible

Why?



sort by: page size:

> Laws are laws.

This is horrible reasoning.


> This is a law.

> No, it is not.

> That's a pretty uncharitable interpretation.


> Seems not that legal

> That seems incredibly illegal.

Why would it be illegal? I understand that it's unfair, but what law would be broken here?


> It is ridiculous how lenient the laws are.

I think it is because people who make the laws are breaking them too.


> This seems like a problem with the existing law, if that's how it works.

> I understand why you feel that way, but it's not the way the law works.

OP was saying they don't think the law should work that way.


> shitty laws don't deserve to be followed

You mean, you have to be ready to be punished for breaqking shitty laws just to point to their shittiness.


>How can that work as a law?

It cannot, and they don't care that it cannot. The cruelty is the point.


>it's a ridiculous law

It's par for the course. Laws in response to moral panics tend to suck and inconvenience reasonable people while having simple workarounds.


> Laws against consumption? A terrible idea.

Why would it be terrible to prohibit biochemical slavery and mind-control?


> ...because in small scale, instead, would be acceptable?!

Because it’s generally a bad idea to legislate for over a third of a billion of humans on the basis of rare freak accidents.


> The law didn't take into consideration that people are awful

Okay. I always ask this: what's your solution to this?


> People sometimes forget that laws are pointless if they are not enforceable.

Or worse than pointless; actively harmful.


> When laws are bad, people should thumb their nose at them

Sure. But use some intelligence and risk management when you're doing it.

This was just outright stupidity, and there's no excuse for it. :( :( :(


> is beyond shitty.

Something being legal doesn't make it moral.


> The only excuse for the law being around so long was that it created jobs. Which was lame reasoning.

This was my understanding and I agree it is bad reasoning. It might have created jobs, but certainly not good ones.


> If you don't expect and accept your local variation of whatever these exceptions are you are going to have a very bad time.

As it turns out I do expect this behavior and still have a very bad time. These laws are not frivolous, and violating them is extremely dangerous.


> If laws protect people. more laws = better? What is the downside of passing any law?

No this is a question about a specific law. Making it a general point about all laws is disingenuous. Why do anything ever?


> Why do people think it is a good thing to have this enforced by law is beyond me.

School shootings - why do we have to enforce not commiting school shootings with the stupid law, surely everyone can get together and agreee murdering a 10 year old for fun is evil and just not do it?


>why not?

Because it's illegal?

next

Legal | privacy