Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

They absolutely can do both, but they don't seem to be willing to do so.


sort by: page size:

Both really. They can't because they won't, but also because they can't.

They seem to do both which is frustrating.

They can't, and that's not what they're trying to do.

They can, doesn't mean they want to or will.

They absolutely could, but they don't want to.

They could, but they don't want to.

Which they're wholly not capable of doing. They just do it because there's little alternative available yet.

Now is that because they don't want to or is it because it isn't feasible to?

Well, they are not suppossed to do so...

They probably are not doing that. As others have pointed out, there are major hurdles to doing that.

What’s stopping them from doing so?

They can try, but no guarantees.

They are in a budget crunch. They likely don't have money to do both.

They could, but they don't.

They could, but...they don't want to. So they won't!

Perhaps they are, but they don't want to.

They can't, because it's not.

It kinda seems like they also can’t.

Of course they can. They don't want to.
next

Legal | privacy