Hacker Read top | best | new | newcomments | leaders | about | bookmarklet login

You should look up the definition of a coup before making statements like that.


sort by: page size:

You are misusing the word coup

I don't think you remotely understand what a coup even is.

That election .. that was a coup.


I guess I'll be pedantic for a moment. A coup, by definition, is a seizure of power from government. If they are not successful at seizing power, then it was not a coup.

What's "coup" ?

thats not a coup, thats obstruction of procedure and didny have a snowballs chance in hell of succeeding. Calling it a coup is bad-faith interpretation of the event.

So you agree: there was a coup attempt. My bad.

Coup

Yeah no. While you may be onto something that still does not make it a coup.

define: coup

> a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government.

That defines a coup. That's also what was attempted.

I don't believe you're posting in good faith. I won't be responding further.


I didn't say that at all. However, taking control of the government is exactly how coups are executed, please look into it if you haven't.

A coup doesn't have to be successful to be a coup.

It should be treated as a coup attempt.

Is this a coup?

Are you saying you think this was a failed coup? On what basis? It looks nothing like the coups I'm familiar with.

Lest this thread gets hijacked with unnecessary "political bickering", I suggest we avoid using words like "coup" here.

That's an interesting and reasonable perspective. If you stretch the definition of a coup to include totally incoherent, incompetent, ineffectual raging that could never actually achieve the outcome, it could qualify. But it still feels like a stretch to me based on what I know of coups (sadly some personal experience there).

I also think calling it a coup inflames tensions and risks credibility for no real benefit. A sober and precise description of events is damning enough.


My problem is with the description of that action as a "coup". I'm not defending those people. I'm not informed well enough to do that. But a coup? I don't think so.

Coups generally rely on military support, or some sort of established basis for taking and holding political power. This was not a coup. Or it was the shittest one ever.


A coup means taking over the country. Decapitating part of the government is assassination. /pedantry

It might be more accurate to call it a coup rather than an election.
next

Legal | privacy